Samsung Galaxy S24 vs Motorola razr+ (2024)
Get the Samsung Galaxy S24 unless you absolutely need a folding phone. The numbers tell the story: a 6.2" display vs a 6.9" on the Motorola razr+ (2024). But if features like the 165Hz refresh rate and a larger cover screen matter to you, the razr+ could be your pick. Samsung Galaxy S24 is the premium option here, offering 7 years of OS updates and a peak brightness of 2600 nits. Meanwhile, the razr+ shines with its impressive 4.0" cover screen, making it the most functional flip phone in the market. After testing both, it's clear they cater to different preferences, especially in real-world use.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Samsung Galaxy S24

Motorola razr+ (2024)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S24 vs Motorola razr+ (2024)

Samsung Galaxy S24

Motorola razr+ (2024)
| Criterion | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Motorola razr+ (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(1,055)Amazon | ★4.3(206)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 7 generations of OS upgrades; 7 years of security updates (guaranteed until 2031) | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (4nm; 8-core CPU: 1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.1GHz A720, 2x2.9GHz A720, 2x2.2GHz A520) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform |
Graphics | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) | Qualcomm Adreno 735 |
RAM | 8 GB (LPDDR5X) | 12GB LPDDR5X |
Storage | 128GB (UFS 3.1) / 256GB (UFS 4.0) / 512GB (UFS 4.0) | 256GB (UFS 4.0) |
Display Size | 6.2" (6.17" measured diagonally as a full rectangle; 6.0" accounting for rounded corners) | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" |
Screen Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X (LTPO) | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED |
Resolution | 2340 x 1080 pixels (FHD+, 416 ppi) | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi |
Refresh Rate | Adaptive 1–120 Hz | 165Hz (Main and Cover) |
Peak Brightness | 2600 nits peak (outdoor) | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (24 mm, f/1.8), Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 12MP Ultra Wide (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° FOV), Super Steady video | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) |
Telephoto Camera | 10MP Telephoto (67 mm, f/2.4), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom |
Optical Zoom | 3x optical zoom; 2x optical-quality zoom (enabled by Adaptive Pixel sensor) | 2x Optical Zoom |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x (Space Zoom) | Up to 30x Digital Zoom |
Video Recording | 8K video at 24/30 fps; 4K at 30/60 fps; Slow motion 1080p at 240 fps | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps |
Front Camera | 12MP Front (26 mm, f/2.2), Dual Pixel PDAF; 4K video at 30/60 fps | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology |
Battery | 4000 mAh (Li-ion); Up to 29 hours video playback | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | USB-C; Up to 50% in ~30 minutes with 25W adapter (sold separately) | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) |
Wireless Charging | Fast Wireless Charging 2.0 (up to 15W); Wireless PowerShare (4.5W) | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave); Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax); Bluetooth 5.3; NFC | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) |
USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IP68 (up to 1.5 m freshwater for 30 min); Armor Aluminum 2 frame; Gorilla Glass Victus 2 front and back | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish |
Dimensions | 5.79" x 2.78" x 0.30" (147.0 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm) | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) |
Weight | 5.93 oz (168 g) (mmWave model) | 6.67 oz (189 g) |
Biometrics | Ultrasonic Fingerprint (under display); Face recognition | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock |
Extras | Galaxy AI (Circle to Search, Live Translate, Note Assist); Samsung DeX; Stereo speakers tuned by AKG; Dual eSIM support | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Samsung Galaxy S24
✓ Pros:
- • Commitment to 7 years of OS and security updates
- • Bright 2600-nit LTPO display adjusts down to 1Hz
- • Compact form factor without compromising on build quality
- • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy chip provides top-tier performance
- • Galaxy AI features integrated directly into the OS
✗ Cons:
- • Wired charging capped at 25W (slower than Plus/Ultra models)
- • Base 128GB model uses slower UFS 3.1 storage (256GB+ uses UFS 4.0)
- • Lacks Wi-Fi 7 support (limited to Wi-Fi 6E)
- • No UWB (Ultra-Wideband) support on the base model
- • 8GB RAM is lower than competitors' standard offerings
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 is the better buy for most people - its 7 years of OS updates crushes the Motorola razr+ (2024). That said, grab the razr+ if you want a folding design with a larger cover screen - it's more functional during daily tasks.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 if: you need 7 years of software support, enjoy a compact design, or want the brightest display at 2600 nits.
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want a larger screen for multitasking, need a higher refresh rate for gaming, or prefer a stylish flip design. (6.9" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
Samsung Galaxy S24 and Motorola razr+ (2024) are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Samsung Galaxy S24 excels if you value commitment to 7 years of os and security updates. Motorola razr+ (2024) is better if you prioritize largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
