Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs Amazfit Falcon
The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra is the flagship option here, boasting an impressive 590mAh battery that lasts up to 100 hours in power-saving mode. In contrast, the Amazfit Falcon's 500mAh battery offers up to 14 days on typical usage, but lacks the endurance for intense activities. What matters most here is how these differences impact your daily use, especially if you're into outdoor adventures or need reliable tracking on the go. Key specs: Weight: 2.13 oz vs 2.26 oz and Storage: 32 GB vs 4 GB.
Why compare these? The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (premium flagship) and Amazfit Falcon (mid-range) represent different approaches to smartwatches. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Samsung Galaxy | Amazfit Falcon |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.4★ (272 reviews) | 4.4★ (557 reviews) |
| Top Strength | True multi-day battery life (up to 100h in power saving) | Elite build quality: Titanium unibody with Sapphire Crystal |
| Main Drawback | Large 47mm square-circle design may not fit smaller wrists | Uses older BioTracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0) |
| Market Position | ✓Flagship | Mid-range |
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Android 11.0 or higher with 1.5GB+ RAM; Samsung Galaxy phone required for Energy Score, ECG, Sleep Apnea, and IHRN features
Wear OS 5 powered by Samsung (One UI 6 Watch)
47.4mm H x 47.1mm W x 12.1mm D
Titanium (Grade 4) frame with cushion design; Sapphire Crystal glass
Amazfit Falcon
Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required)
Zepp OS (Proprietary)
49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm)
Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs Amazfit Falcon
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Amazfit Falcon
| Criterion | Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra | Amazfit Falcon |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(272)Amazon | ★4.4(557)Amazon |
Compatibility | Android 11.0 or higher with 1.5GB+ RAM; Samsung Galaxy phone required for Energy Score, ECG, Sleep Apnea, and IHRN features | Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required) |
Operating System | Wear OS 5 powered by Samsung (One UI 6 Watch) | Zepp OS (Proprietary) |
Case Size | 47.4mm H x 47.1mm W x 12.1mm D | 49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm) |
Case Material | Titanium (Grade 4) frame with cushion design; Sapphire Crystal glass | Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel |
Display Type | Super AMOLED; Always-On Display; Peak brightness 3000 nits | AMOLED; Always-On Display supported; Anti-fingerprint coating |
Display Size | 1.5 in (37.3 mm) circular display | 1.28 in (32.5 mm) diameter |
Resolution | 480 x 480 pixels | 416 x 416 pixels (326 ppi) |
Always On Display | Yes | Yes |
Water Resistance | 10 ATM + IP68 (ISO 22810 standard); Ocean swimming capable | 20 ATM (water pressure equivalent to 200 meters); High-speed water sports capable |
Durability | MIL-STD-810H certified; Operating temp -20°C to 55°C; 9000m altitude resistance | MIL-STD-810G tested; Titanium unibody; Sapphire crystal screen |
GPS | Dual-frequency GPS (L1+L5); Glonass; Beidou; Galileo | Dual-band GNSS; 6 Satellite Positioning Systems (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NAVIC) |
Connectivity | LTE (eSIM standard on all models); Wi-Fi 2.4+5GHz; Bluetooth 5.3; NFC | WLAN 2.4GHz; Bluetooth 5.0 BLE |
NFC Payments | Samsung Wallet / Google Wallet | No |
Sensors | Samsung BioActive Sensor (Optical Bio-signal + Electrical Heart + Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis); Temperature sensor; Accelerometer; Barometer; Gyro sensor; Geomagnetic sensor; Light sensor | BioTracker™ 3.0 PPG biometric sensor (supports blood-oxygen, 6PD); Accelerometer; Gyroscope; Geomagnetic sensor; Barometric altimeter; Ambient light sensor |
Health Features | Energy Score; Sleep Apnea detection (FDA authorized); AGEs Index; Body Composition; ECG; Irregular Heart Rhythm Notification; Cycle Tracking with skin temperature; Sleep coaching | Zepp Coach (AI-powered training guidance); 24H Heart Rate; SpO2; Stress monitoring; Sleep tracking (Light, Deep, REM); SomnusCare™ sleep score; Breathing exercises |
Workout Modes | Multisport tile (Triathlon/Duathlon/Aquathlon); Functional Threshold Power (FTP) for cycling; Race Partner; Track Back; Custom workouts via Quick Button | Triathlon; Track Run (with lap data correction); Strength Training (auto-detection of 25 movements); Golf Swing; Skiing; High-speed water sports; and 150+ others |
Storage | 32GB | 4GB total (Approx. 2.3GB user-accessible for music) |
Speaker Mic | Speaker (with Siren support); Microphone | None (Bluetooth headphones required for music/audio feedback) |
Calls | Yes (LTE standalone or via paired phone) | No (Notification alerts only) |
Battery | 590mAh; Up to 100 hours (Power Saving); Up to 60 hours (Normal use, AOD off); Up to 48 hours (Exercise Power Saving) | 500 mAh; Up to 14 days (Typical usage); Up to 7 days (Heavy usage); Up to 21 hours (Accuracy GPS mode); Up to 50 hours (Power Saving GPS mode) |
Charging | Fast Wireless Charging (WPC Inductive); Proprietary puck required for max speed | 5-pin plug charger; Approx. 2 hours to full charge |
Weight | 60.5 g (Body only) | 64 g (Body only) |
Band Sizes | One Size (fits 145–205mm wrists via Dynamic Lug System) | 22mm width; Fits 150–205 mm wrists (Liquid Silicone strap included) |
Extras | Quick Button (customizable); 86dB Emergency Siren; Night Mode watch face; Gesture controls (Double Pinch) | Offline Maps (Import route files); Real-time navigation; Music storage (MP3); Broadcast heart rate via Bluetooth; External workout device support (Heart rate belts, power meters) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Android 11.0 or higher with 1.5GB+ RAM; Samsung Galaxy phone required for Energy Score, ECG, Sleep Apnea, and IHRN features
Wear OS 5 powered by Samsung (One UI 6 Watch)
47.4mm H x 47.1mm W x 12.1mm D
Titanium (Grade 4) frame with cushion design; Sapphire Crystal glass
Super AMOLED; Always-On Display; Peak brightness 3000 nits
1.5 in (37.3 mm) circular display
Pros
- True multi-day battery life (up to 100h in power saving)
- Extremely durable Grade 4 Titanium build with 10ATM rating
Cons
- Large 47mm square-circle design may not fit smaller wrists
- Key health features (ECG, Sleep Apnea) locked to Samsung phones
Amazfit Falcon
Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required)
Zepp OS (Proprietary)
49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm)
Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel
AMOLED; Always-On Display supported; Anti-fingerprint coating
1.28 in (32.5 mm) diameter
Pros
- Elite build quality: Titanium unibody with Sapphire Crystal
- 20 ATM water resistance is double that of most outdoor watches
Cons
- Uses older BioTracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0)
- No speaker or microphone for calls or voice assistants
Which one is better?
The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra is the better buy for most people - its 590mAh battery crushes the Amazfit Falcon's 500mAh in endurance. That said, grab the Amazfit Falcon if you want a watch with double the water resistance at 20 ATM, perfect for high-speed water sports.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra if: you need multi-day battery life, require advanced health features like ECG, or want superior durability with a titanium build. (2.13 oz weight, 32 GB storage)
Choose the Amazfit Falcon if: you prefer a watch for water sports, want a budget-friendly option with good build quality, or need offline music storage for workouts. (2.26 oz weight, 4 GB storage)
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 557 reviews vs 272
→ Choose Amazfit Falcon
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Samsung Galaxy
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Amazfit Falcon
True multi-day battery Priority
True multi-day battery life (up to 100h in power saving)
→ Choose Samsung Galaxy
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.4★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra or Amazfit Falcon?
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra is the better choice if you prioritize true multi-day battery life (up to 100h in power saving). Amazfit Falcon wins if you value elite build quality: titanium unibody with sapphire crystal. Both are rated highly (4.4★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra and Amazfit Falcon?
Key differences: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra offers true multi-day battery life (up to 100h in power saving), while Amazfit Falcon stands out with elite build quality: titanium unibody with sapphire crystal. Consider that Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra large 47mm square-circle design may not fit smaller wrists. Meanwhile, Amazfit Falcon uses older biotracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.