Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Motorola razr (2023)
For most users, the Motorola razr (2023) is the smarter buy - its 6.9" FHD+ display at 144Hz crushes the Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro's 6.6" screen at 120Hz. If you're looking for a mid-range foldable that excels in display quality and design, the razr stands out. Meanwhile, the XCover6 Pro’s rugged build means it's perfect for outdoor work,. So, while the Samsung is built for durability, the Motorola excels in daily usability and style. The deciding factor really comes down to your specific needs—ruggedness or premium design.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

Motorola razr (2023)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Motorola razr (2023)

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

Motorola razr (2023)
| Criterion | Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Motorola razr (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★3.9(215)Amazon | ★4.3(513)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates (Enterprise Edition standard) | 3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) |
Graphics | Adreno 642L | Adreno 644 |
RAM | 6GB | 8GB LPDDR4X |
Storage | 128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB) | 128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable) |
Display Size | 6.6" | Main: 6.9" / External: 1.5" |
Screen Type | PLS LCD, 120Hz, Wet Touch & Glove Mode | Main: FHD+ pOLED, LTPO, 144Hz / External: OLED, 60Hz |
Resolution | 2408 x 1080 (FHD+) | Main: 2640 x 1080 (413 ppi) / External: 194 x 368 (282 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | Main: Up to 144Hz / External: 60Hz |
Peak Brightness | 480 nits (Typical) / 500 nits (Peak) — optimized for indoor/industrial use | 1,400 nits (Main Peak) / 1,000 nits (External Peak) |
Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, PDAF, Dual-LED Flash | 64MP, f/1.7, 0.7µm, OIS, Laser AF (Quad Pixel to 16MP) |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 8MP, f/2.2, 123-degree FOV | 13MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV, Macro Vision |
Telephoto Camera | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 10x | Up to 8x |
Video Recording | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 60fps | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps |
Front Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 32MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm (Quad Pixel to 8MP) |
Battery | 4,050mAh (User-Removable) | 4,200mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | 15W Fast Charging (Support up to 25W with specific adapters); POGO Pin Charging | 30W TurboPower (Charger NOT included in US retail box) |
Wireless Charging | No (Standard Qi not supported; POGO charging cradles used instead) | 5W Wireless Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, PTT (Push-to-Talk) | 5G (Sub-6/mmWave - Carrier Dependent), Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 (Supports DeX) | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IP68 (Water/Dust Resistant); MIL-STD-810H Certified; Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | IP52 (Water-repellent coating - Splash Resistant only) |
Dimensions | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 in (168.8 x 79.9 x 9.9 mm) | Open: 6.73 x 2.91 x 0.29 in (170.8 x 74.0 x 7.35 mm) / Closed: 3.47 x 2.91 x 0.62 in |
Weight | 8.29 oz (235 g) | 6.65 oz (188.6 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, Face Recognition | Side-mounted fingerprint reader, Face Unlock |
Extras | Two Programmable Keys (XCover Key, Top Key), Samsung DeX, Dual Microphones, Barometer | Vegan Leather finish, Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos), Ready For (Wireless only) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
✓ Pros:
- • User-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work
- • Rugged build (IP68/MIL-STD-810H) survives drops without a case
- • Physical programmable keys are excellent for Push-to-Talk or app launching
- • Supports Wi-Fi 6E and Samsung DeX for desktop-like productivity
- • Touchscreen works with gloves and in wet conditions
✗ Cons:
- • Display brightness (~500 nits) is low for outdoor use compared to S-series
- • No standard Qi wireless charging (requires proprietary POGO docks)
- • Charging speed is modest (15W included, 25W capable)
- • Cameras are functional but lack optical stabilization (OIS)
- • Price is high relative to raw performance specs (paying for ruggedness)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr (2023)
✓ Pros:
- • Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US
- • Battery life (4,200mAh) exceeds that of the premium Razr+ and Galaxy Z Flip5
- • Premium vegan leather design feels grippy and durable
- • Main screen is excellent: 144Hz LTPO with invisible crease mechanics
- • Includes wireless charging (albeit slow 5W)
✗ Cons:
- • External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+)
- • Charger is NOT included in the box (unlike previous Moto G phones)
- • Performance (Snapdragon 7 Gen 1) is mid-range, not flagship level
- • IP52 rating is weak compared to Samsung's IPX8 (submersion protection)
- • USB 2.0 port means slow data transfer and no wired video output
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Motorola razr (2023) is the better buy for most people - its 6.9" display at 144Hz beats the XCover6 Pro's display for smoothness.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro if: you work in rugged environments and need a user-removable battery, you rely on tactile keys for quick access, or you want a durable phone that supports 5G connectivity.
Choose the Motorola razr (2023) if: you want the most affordable foldable phone with a stunning display, you prioritize battery life for daily use, or you appreciate a stylish design with a compact form factor. (6.9" display, 144 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro excels if you value user-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work. Motorola razr (2023) is better if you prioritize most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
