SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
The SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor is the mid-range option, offering a larger 32" screen and a solid 165Hz refresh rate. However, the LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor's blisteringly fast 240Hz refresh rate and OLED technology deliver superior motion clarity and stunning contrast. In real-world use, the 240Hz refresh rate on the LG UltraGear means smoother gameplay, especially in fast-paced titles. The SAMSUNG's 300 nits brightness is decent for general use, but the LG's OLED panel excels with perfect blacks and infinite contrast, making it a no-brainer for serious gamers and content creators in darker settings.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor | LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(2,537)Amazon | ★4.5(849)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 32" Class (31.5" Viewable) | 26.5" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | WOLED (White OLED) |
Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) | 240 Hz |
Response Time | 1 ms (MPRT) | 0.03 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 300 nits (Typical) / 200 nits (Min) | 200 nits (SDR Typical) / 1,000 nits (HDR Peak at 3% APL) |
Contrast | 2,500:1 (Static) | 1,500,000:1 (Typ.) |
Color Gamut | Not officially specified (Approx. 99% sRGB) | 98.5% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1000R | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x USB (Service only) | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4 (DSC); 1x USB 3.0 Upstream; 2x USB 3.0 Downstream; 1x 4-Pole Headphone Out (DTS Headphone:X); 1x Optical Audio Out (SPDIF) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 75 x 75 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-2° to 18°) | Height (110mm), Swivel (-10° to 10°), Tilt (-5° to 15°), Pivot (90°) |
Power Consumption | 39 W (Typical) / 59 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 36.7 W (Typical) / 94 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 5,700 g (12.57 lbs) | 7,350 g (16.2 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Aggressive 1000R curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion
- • 165Hz refresh rate and 1ms (MPRT) deliver smooth, responsive gameplay
- • WQHD resolution (2560x1440) offers significantly sharper detail than 1080p monitors
- • Supports AMD FreeSync Premium to eliminate screen tearing and stuttering
- • High contrast (2,500:1) provides deeper blacks than IPS competitors
✗ Cons:
- • Stand is basic with Tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel)
- • Brightness (300 nits) is insufficient for a impactful HDR experience
- • VA panel response times can lead to 'black smearing' in dark scenes
- • No USB hub or built-in speakers
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • WOLED panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming
- • 240Hz refresh rate combined with 0.03ms response provides motion clarity matching 360Hz LCDs
- • Includes a physical remote control for easy OSD access (rare for monitors)
- • Matte anti-glare coating reduces reflections in lit rooms (unlike glossy QD-OLEDs)
- • Supports 4K @ 120Hz downscaling via HDMI 2.1 for PS5/Xbox Series X
✗ Cons:
- • SDR brightness is aggressive capped (~200 nits), looking dim in bright rooms
- • Matte coating can introduce a slight 'grain' or fuzziness to white backgrounds
- • RWBG subpixel layout causes text fringing (text looks less sharp than on LCDs)
- • Aggressive ABL (Auto Brightness Limiter) dims the screen when large white windows are open
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its impressive 240Hz refresh rate crushes the SAMSUNG's 165Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor if: you want a larger 32" display for immersive gaming, you prioritize a lower price point, or you prefer a curved screen for added depth.
Choose the LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor if: you need the fastest refresh rate for competitive gaming, you're a content creator who values display quality, or you play in darker environments where OLED shines. (26.5" display, 240 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor excels if you value aggressive 1000r curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion. LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize woled panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.