Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor vs SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
The Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor is the budget option here, but its 75Hz refresh rate offers smoother visuals than standard monitors. Meanwhile, the SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor shines with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440, providing sharper details that are a game changer for gamers and content creators alike. In real-world use, the Sceptre's 8ms response time can lead to noticeable ghosting, especially in fast-paced games. On the flip side, the Odyssey's impressive 1ms response time and 165Hz refresh rate make it ideal for competitive gaming, ensuring you won't miss a beat during intense moments. So, which one should you grab for your setup in 2026? Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 32" and Refresh: 75 Hz vs 165 Hz.
Why compare these? The Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor (budget-friendly) and SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor (mid-range) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Sceptre E248W-19203R | SAMSUNG Odyssey |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.5★ (38,105 reviews) | 4.4★ (2,537 reviews) |
| Top Strength | VA panel delivers deep blacks with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio | Aggressive 1000R curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion |
| Main Drawback | Stand ergonomics are limited to Tilt only (no height or swivel adjustment) | Stand is basic with Tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel) |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |

Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)

SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
32" Class (31.5" Viewable)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor vs SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor

Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor

SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor | SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(38,105)Amazon | ★4.4(2,537)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 32" Class (31.5" Viewable) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 75 Hz | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 8 ms (GtG) | 1 ms (MPRT) |
Brightness | 250 cd/m² | 300 nits (Typical) / 200 nits (Min) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) | 2,500:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 95% sRGB / 76% DCI-P3 | Not officially specified (Approx. 99% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 (Software support) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync (48Hz - 75Hz range) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1000R |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (4Ω) | No (None) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x USB (Service only) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Tilt only (-2° to 18°) |
Power Consumption | 25.4 W (Typical) / 30 W (Max) | 39 W (Typical) / 59 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 2,890 g (6.37 lbs) | 5,700 g (12.57 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
75 Hz
8 ms (GtG)
Pros
- VA panel delivers deep blacks with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio
- 75Hz refresh rate provides smoother motion than standard 60Hz office monitors
Cons
- Stand ergonomics are limited to Tilt only (no height or swivel adjustment)
- Response time (8ms) is slower than IPS/TN gaming monitors, leading to potential ghosting

SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
32" Class (31.5" Viewable)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI)
1 ms (MPRT)
Pros
- Aggressive 1000R curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion
- 165Hz refresh rate and 1ms (MPRT) deliver smooth, responsive gameplay
Cons
- Stand is basic with Tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel)
- Brightness (300 nits) is insufficient for a impactful HDR experience
Which one is better?
The SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 165Hz refresh rate crushes the Sceptre's 75Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor if: you need a budget-friendly display for casual use, prefer a smaller screen for tight spaces, or have basic tasks like browsing and office work. (23.8" display, 75 Hz refresh)
Choose the SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor if: you play competitive games often, want an immersive experience with a large curved screen, or require higher resolution for content creation. (32" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Sceptre E248W-19203R
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 38,105 reviews vs 2,537
→ Choose Sceptre E248W-19203R
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose SAMSUNG Odyssey
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Sceptre E248W-19203R
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor edges ahead with a 4.5★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor or SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor?
Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize va panel delivers deep blacks with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio. SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor wins if you value aggressive 1000r curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion. Both are rated highly (4.5★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor and SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor?
Key differences: Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor offers va panel delivers deep blacks with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio, while SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor stands out with aggressive 1000r curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion. Consider that Sceptre E248W-19203R 24" FHD 75Hz Monitor stand ergonomics are limited to tilt only (no height or swivel adjustment). Meanwhile, SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor stand is basic with tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
