Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the smarter buy for most users, especially gamers. With a jaw-dropping resolution of 3440 x 1440 and a refresh rate of 160Hz, it crushes the Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor's 1920 x 1080 and 75Hz, delivering a far more immersive experience. In real-world use, that extra screen space and faster refresh rate mean smoother gameplay and better multitasking. You'll appreciate the 1ms motion blur reduction that keeps fast-moving scenes crystal clear, something the Sceptre can't match with its slower 8ms response time. Key specs: Display: 23.6" vs 34" and Refresh: 75 Hz vs 160 Hz.
Why compare these? The Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor (budget-friendly) and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor (mid-range) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Sceptre C248W-1920RN | LG 34WP60C-B |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (24,344 reviews) | 4.6★ (1,104 reviews) |
| Top Strength | High static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of VA panels | Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9 |
| Main Drawback | Slow 8ms response time can cause noticeable ghosting in fast-paced games | Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
| Criterion | Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(24,344)Amazon | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.6" Viewable (24" Class) | 34" Viewable (34" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 75 Hz | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 8 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) | 3,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 85% sRGB / 70% DCI-P3 | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | No (Not supported on 'RN' model) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | 1800R |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (4Ω) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x 3.5mm Audio In | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 75 x 75 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) |
Power Consumption | 23 W (Typical) / 29 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 2,998 g (6.61 lbs) | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
75 Hz
8 ms (GtG)
Pros
- High static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of VA panels
- 1800R curvature adds a layer of immersion to the 24-inch viewing experience
Cons
- Slow 8ms response time can cause noticeable ghosting in fast-paced games
- Lacks Adaptive Sync / FreeSync support (unlike the 'RNR' variant)
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI)
5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR)
Pros
- Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
Cons
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
Which one is better?
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 160Hz refresh rate crushes the Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor's 75Hz. That said, grab the Sceptre if you're on a tight budget and need a basic monitor for everyday tasks.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor if: you want to save money, need a simple display for work, or prefer a smaller screen size. (23.6" display, 75 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if: you game often, require extensive screen real estate for multitasking, or enjoy watching content in higher resolution. (34" display, 160 Hz refresh)
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 24,344 reviews vs 1,104
→ Choose Sceptre C248W-1920RN
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Sceptre C248W-1920RN
High static contrast Priority
High static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of VA panels
→ Choose Sceptre C248W-1920RN
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.6★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor or LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize high static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of va panels. LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor wins if you value expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
Key differences: Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor offers high static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of va panels, while LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stands out with expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Consider that Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor slow 8ms response time can cause noticeable ghosting in fast-paced games. Meanwhile, LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.