Skullcandy Crusher Evo vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black)
The Skullcandy Crusher Evo is the more premium option here, but its adjustable Sensory Bass slider gives you a unique bass experience. In real-world use, that means you can crank up the bass for a more immersive sound while enjoying 40 hours of battery life. Meanwhile, the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) boasts an impressive 50-hour battery life, making it a no-brainer for anyone who wants to minimize charging frequency. Key specs: Weight: 11.01 oz vs 10.83 oz and Battery: 40h vs 50h.
Why compare these? Both the Skullcandy Crusher Evo and Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) are mid-range headphones competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for mid-range features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Skullcandy Crusher | Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.7★ (5,878 reviews) | 4.4★ (3,219 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Adjustable Sensory Bass slider provides a unique, skull-rattling bass experience | Exceptional battery life (up to 50 hours) minimizes charging frequency |
| Main Drawback | Lacks Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and Transparency modes | Lacks Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) and Transparency modes found in competitors |
| Market Position | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Over-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.0 + 3.5mm AUX (wired)
Bluetooth 5.0
SBC, AAC
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black)
Over-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.0 + USB-C (Charging) + 3.5mm Jack (Analog)
Bluetooth 5.0
LDAC, AAC, SBC
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Skullcandy Crusher Evo vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black)
Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black)
| Criterion | Skullcandy Crusher Evo | Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(5,878)Amazon | ★4.4(3,219)Amazon |
Form Factor | Over-ear (closed-back) | Over-ear (closed-back) |
Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.0 + 3.5mm AUX (wired) | Bluetooth 5.0 + USB-C (Charging) + 3.5mm Jack (Analog) |
Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
Codecs | SBC, AAC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
ANC | No (Passive noise isolation only) | No (Passive noise isolation only) |
Transparency | No (Not supported) | No |
Drivers | 40mm Dynamic Drivers + Dedicated Crusher Haptic Bass Drivers | 45mm large-aperture drivers with rare earth magnets |
Frequency Response | 20 Hz – 20,000 Hz | 15 Hz – 28,000 Hz |
Microphones | Built-in microphone for calls | Dual MEMS microphones (beamforming) |
Battery Life | Up to 40 hours | Up to 50 hours (Continuous use) |
Battery Life | N/A (No charging case) | N/A (No charging case) |
Charging | USB-C Rapid Charge; 10 min = 4 hours playback | USB-C; ~3.5 hours full charge; 10 min rapid charge = up to 3 hours playback |
Multipoint | No (Single device connection only) | Yes (2 devices) |
Low Latency Mode | No (App offers 'Movie Mode' to optimize audio sync, but no dedicated low-latency protocol) | Yes (via Audio-Technica CONNECT app) |
Wired Mode | Yes (3.5mm AUX cable included) | Yes (1.2 m / 3.9' cable included; works with zero battery) |
Water Resistance | No (No IP rating) | None (No IP rating) |
Weight | 11.0 oz (312 g) | 10.8 oz (307 g) |
Controls | Physical buttons (Volume, Power/Pairing, Track) + Sensory Bass Slider | Physical buttons (Power/Pairing, Volume, Multifunction/Voice Assistant) |
App Eq | Skullcandy App (Personal Sound by Audiodo™, EQ Modes: Music, Movie, Podcast) | Audio-Technica CONNECT app (5-band EQ, Codec switch, Low Latency, L/R Balance) |
Extras | Built-in Tile™ finding technology; Foldable design; Travel bag included | Google Fast Pair; Amazon Alexa built-in; Sidetone circuitry; 1.2 m cable & carrying pouch included |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Over-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.0 + 3.5mm AUX (wired)
Bluetooth 5.0
SBC, AAC
No (Passive noise isolation only)
No (Not supported)
Pros
- Adjustable Sensory Bass slider provides a unique, skull-rattling bass experience
- Personal Sound feature by Audiodo™ effectively optimizes audio for individual hearing profiles
Cons
- Lacks Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and Transparency modes
- No Bluetooth Multipoint support (cannot connect to phone and laptop simultaneously)
Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black)
Over-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.0 + USB-C (Charging) + 3.5mm Jack (Analog)
Bluetooth 5.0
LDAC, AAC, SBC
No (Passive noise isolation only)
No
Pros
- Exceptional battery life (up to 50 hours) minimizes charging frequency
- High-resolution audio support via LDAC codec
Cons
- Lacks Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) and Transparency modes found in competitors
- No official IP water or dust resistance rating
Which one is better?
The Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) is the better buy for most people - its 50-hour battery life crushes the Skullcandy Crusher Evo's 40 hours. That said, grab the Crusher Evo if you crave booming bass and flexibility in tuning your sound profile.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Skullcandy Crusher Evo if: you love bass-heavy music, enjoy personalizing your audio experience, or want to easily locate your headphones with Tile technology. (11.01 oz weight)
Choose the Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) if: you need longer battery life, desire high-resolution audio support, or frequently switch between devices with multipoint connectivity. (10.83 oz weight)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Skullcandy Crusher
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 5,878 reviews vs 3,219
→ Choose Skullcandy Crusher
Adjustable Sensory Bass Priority
Adjustable Sensory Bass slider provides a unique, skull-rattling bass experience
→ Choose Skullcandy Crusher
Exceptional battery life Priority
Exceptional battery life (up to 50 hours) minimizes charging frequency
→ Choose Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The Skullcandy Crusher Evo edges ahead with a 4.7★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Skullcandy Crusher Evo or Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black)?
Skullcandy Crusher Evo is the better choice if you prioritize adjustable sensory bass slider provides a unique, skull-rattling bass experience. Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) wins if you value exceptional battery life (up to 50 hours) minimizes charging frequency. Both are rated highly (4.7★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Skullcandy Crusher Evo and Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black)?
Key differences: Skullcandy Crusher Evo offers adjustable sensory bass slider provides a unique, skull-rattling bass experience, while Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) stands out with exceptional battery life (up to 50 hours) minimizes charging frequency. Consider that Skullcandy Crusher Evo lacks active noise cancellation (anc) and transparency modes. Meanwhile, Audio-Technica ATH-M50xBT2 (Black) lacks active noise cancelling (anc) and transparency modes found in competitors. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.