Soundcore Space One vs Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
If you're after headphones that deliver some serious audio performance, the Soundcore Space One is the better buy for most people. With a staggering 55 hours of battery life without ANC, you can enjoy your music all day long without interruption. However, if you want something lighter and still want to save some cash, the Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones might catch your eye with their 50-hour battery life and impressive sound quality. In real-world use, the Soundcore's Adaptive ANC reduces noise by up to 98%, making it a game-changer for travelers or commuters. Meanwhile, the Beats Solo 4's native lossless audio support via USB-C is impressive for audiophiles, but the lack of Active Noise Cancelling might leave some users wanting more. So, the numbers tell the story: 55 hours versus 50 hours, but the real question is how you plan to use them. Key specs: Battery: 55h vs 50h and Weight: 9.35oz vs 7.65oz.
Why compare these? Both the Soundcore Space One and Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones are mid-range headphones competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for mid-range features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Soundcore Space | Beats Solo |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.4★ (12,971 reviews) | ✓4.6★ (23,077 reviews) |
| Top Strength | LDAC codec support for Hi-Res Wireless Audio | Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging |
| Main Drawback | Build quality feels plasticky compared to premium models | No Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) |
| Market Position | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Soundcore Space One
Over-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.3 + 3.5mm AUX (wired)
5.3
SBC, AAC, LDAC
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
On-ear
Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input
5.3
SBC, AAC
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Soundcore Space One vs Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
Soundcore Space One
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
| Criterion | Soundcore Space One | Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(12,971)Amazon | ★4.6(23,077)Amazon |
Form Factor | Over-ear (closed-back) | On-ear |
Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.3 + 3.5mm AUX (wired) | Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input |
Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Codecs | SBC, AAC, LDAC | SBC, AAC |
ANC | Adaptive ANC (Reduces noise by up to 98%) | No (Passive noise isolation only) |
Transparency | Yes (Transparency mode; 5 adjustable levels) | No (Not supported) |
Drivers | 40 mm dynamic drivers | 40 mm custom-built transducers |
Frequency Response | 20 Hz – 40 kHz (Hi-Res Audio wired/LDAC) | N/A (Manufacturer does not publish) |
Microphones | 3 mics with AI algorithm (for clear calls) | Digital beam-forming microphones with voice-targeting algorithm |
Battery Life | 55H (ANC Off) / 40H (ANC On) | Up to 50 hours |
Battery Life | N/A (No charging case) | N/A (Headphones only) |
Charging | USB-C; 5 min = 4 hrs (Normal mode); Full charge ~2 hrs | USB-C (Fast Fuel: 10 min charge = up to 5 hours playback) |
Multipoint | Yes (Connect to 2 devices simultaneously) | No (No simultaneous multi-device connection) |
Low Latency Mode | No (Not supported) | No (Standard Bluetooth latency) |
Wired Mode | Yes (3.5mm AUX; Bluetooth disabled in wired mode) | Yes (USB-C for lossless audio; 3.5 mm analog available without battery power) |
Water Resistance | No (Not waterproof/sweatproof) | No (No IP rating) |
Weight | 9.35 oz (265 g) | 217 g (7.65 oz) |
Controls | Physical buttons (Power, Volume +/-, NC) + soundcore app | Physical 'b' button (play/pause, calls, voice assistant), volume rocker |
App Eq | soundcore app (HearID EQ, Custom EQ, Presets) | No (No in-app EQ customization) |
Extras | Travel pouch; wear detection (auto-pause); Google Fast Pair | Personalized Spatial Audio with Dynamic Head Tracking; Built-in DAC; Audio Sharing (iOS); Find My (iOS) / Find My Device (Android); Foldable design |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Soundcore Space One
Over-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.3 + 3.5mm AUX (wired)
5.3
SBC, AAC, LDAC
Adaptive ANC (Reduces noise by up to 98%)
Yes (Transparency mode; 5 adjustable levels)
Pros
- LDAC codec support for Hi-Res Wireless Audio
- Effective Adaptive ANC at a mid-range price point
Cons
- Build quality feels plasticky compared to premium models
- No dedicated low-latency/gaming mode
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
On-ear
Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input
5.3
SBC, AAC
No (Passive noise isolation only)
No (Not supported)
Pros
- Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging
- Native lossless audio support via USB-C (built-in DAC)
Cons
- No Active Noise Cancelling (ANC)
- No Transparency / Ambient mode
Which one is better?
The Soundcore Space One is the better buy for most people - its 55-hour battery life crushes the Beats Solo 4's 50 hours. That said, grab the Beats if you prioritize lightweight design and lossless audio support - it's lighter and offers a unique audio experience.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Soundcore Space One if: you need long battery life for extended use, value Active Noise Cancelling for travel, or want high-res audio with LDAC support. (9.35 oz weight)
Choose the Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones if: you prefer a lightweight design for comfort, enjoy lossless audio via USB-C, or often use iOS devices for seamless pairing. (7.65 oz weight)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Beats Solo
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 23,077 reviews vs 12,971
→ Choose Beats Solo
LDAC codec support Priority
LDAC codec support for Hi-Res Wireless Audio
→ Choose Soundcore Space
Exceptional 50-hour battery Priority
Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging
→ Choose Beats Solo
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones leads with a 4.6★ rating versus 4.4★. That said, Soundcore Space One could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Soundcore Space One or Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones?
Soundcore Space One is the better choice if you prioritize ldac codec support for hi-res wireless audio. Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins if you value exceptional 50-hour battery life with fast fuel charging. Both are rated highly (4.4★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Soundcore Space One and Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones?
Key differences: Soundcore Space One offers ldac codec support for hi-res wireless audio, while Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones stands out with exceptional 50-hour battery life with fast fuel charging. Consider that Soundcore Space One build quality feels plasticky compared to premium models. Meanwhile, Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones no active noise cancelling (anc). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: February 7, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.