TCL 50 XL 5G vs Motorola razr (2023)
What matters most here is the performance and experience. The TCL’s 120Hz refresh rate is excellent for gaming, while the Motorola’s 144Hz screen elevates the smoothness of interactions. However, the Motorola shines brighter with a peak brightness of 1,400 nits compared to TCL's 550 nits, making it much more usable in direct sunlight. Key specs: Display: 6.78" vs 6.9" and Refresh: 120 Hz vs 144 Hz.
Why compare these? The TCL 50 XL 5G (budget-friendly) and Motorola razr (2023) (mid-range) represent different approaches to smartphones. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | TCL 50 | Motorola razr |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.1★ (19 reviews) | ✓4.3★ (513 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Huge 6.78-inch FHD+ 120Hz display is rare for this price | Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US |
| Main Drawback | Ultrawide camera is low resolution (5MP) and muddy | External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+) |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |

TCL 50 XL 5G
Android
1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 2 years of security updates
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm octa-core)
Mali-G57 MC2

Motorola razr (2023)
Android
3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
Adreno 644
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: TCL 50 XL 5G vs Motorola razr (2023)

TCL 50 XL 5G

Motorola razr (2023)
| Criterion | TCL 50 XL 5G | Motorola razr (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.1(19)Amazon | ★4.3(513)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 2 years of security updates | 3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates |
Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm octa-core) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) |
Graphics | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 644 |
RAM | 6GB (Plus up to 6GB Virtual RAM Expansion) | 8GB LPDDR4X |
Storage | 128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 2TB) | 128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable) |
Display Size | 6.78" | Main: 6.9" / External: 1.5" |
Screen Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, NXTVISION Technology | Main: FHD+ pOLED, LTPO, 144Hz / External: OLED, 60Hz |
Resolution | 2460 x 1080 (FHD+) | Main: 2640 x 1080 (413 ppi) / External: 194 x 368 (282 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz (Adaptive) | Main: Up to 144Hz / External: 60Hz |
Peak Brightness | 500 nits (Typical) / 550 nits (HBM) | 1,400 nits (Main Peak) / 1,000 nits (External Peak) |
Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, PDAF (1/2.76" sensor) | 64MP, f/1.7, 0.7µm, OIS, Laser AF (Quad Pixel to 16MP) |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 5MP, f/2.2, 115-degree FOV | 13MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV, Macro Vision |
Telephoto Camera | No (Not supported) — Includes 2MP Depth Sensor f/2.4 | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 10x | Up to 8x |
Video Recording | 1080p @ 30fps | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps |
Front Camera | 8MP, f/2.0, 1080p @ 30fps | 32MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm (Quad Pixel to 8MP) |
Battery | 5,010mAh (Typical) | 4,200mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | 18W Fast Charging (Charger included in box) | 30W TurboPower (Charger NOT included in US retail box) |
Wireless Charging | No (Not supported) | 5W Wireless Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC | 5G (Sub-6/mmWave - Carrier Dependent), Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | No official IP rating | IP52 (Water-repellent coating - Splash Resistant only) |
Dimensions | 6.60 x 2.97 x 0.32 in (167.6 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm) | Open: 6.73 x 2.91 x 0.29 in (170.8 x 74.0 x 7.35 mm) / Closed: 3.47 x 2.91 x 0.62 in |
Weight | 6.88 oz (195 g) | 6.65 oz (188.6 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, Face Unlock | Side-mounted fingerprint reader, Face Unlock |
Extras | Stereo speakers (DTS Sound), 3.5mm Headphone Jack, microSD slot, 18W Charger included | Vegan Leather finish, Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos), Ready For (Wireless only) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

TCL 50 XL 5G
Android
1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 2 years of security updates
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm octa-core)
Mali-G57 MC2
6GB (Plus up to 6GB Virtual RAM Expansion)
128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 2TB)
Pros
- Huge 6.78-inch FHD+ 120Hz display is rare for this price
- Includes 18W charger, cable, and sometimes a case in the box
Cons
- Ultrawide camera is low resolution (5MP) and muddy
- No official IP rating for water or dust resistance

Motorola razr (2023)
Android
3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
Adreno 644
8GB LPDDR4X
128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable)
Pros
- Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US
- Battery life (4,200mAh) exceeds that of the premium Razr+ and Galaxy Z Flip5
Cons
- External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+)
- Charger is NOT included in the box (unlike previous Moto G phones)
Which one is better?
Grab the Motorola razr (2023) if you want a foldable design that's lighter at 6.65oz versus TCL's 6.88oz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the TCL 50 XL 5G if: you want a large display for gaming, need a long-lasting battery for all-day use, or prefer expandable storage. (6.78" display, 120 Hz refresh)
Choose the Motorola razr (2023) if: you want a unique foldable design, prioritize having an ultra-responsive display, or are okay with a smaller battery. (6.9" display, 144 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.3★ vs 4.1★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Motorola razr
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 513 reviews vs 19
→ Choose Motorola razr
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Motorola razr
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose TCL 50
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The Motorola razr (2023) leads with a 4.3★ rating versus 4.1★. That said, TCL 50 XL 5G could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: TCL 50 XL 5G or Motorola razr (2023)?
TCL 50 XL 5G is the better choice if you prioritize huge 6.78-inch fhd+ 120hz display is rare for this price. Motorola razr (2023) wins if you value most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Both are rated highly (4.1★ vs 4.3★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between TCL 50 XL 5G and Motorola razr (2023)?
Key differences: TCL 50 XL 5G offers huge 6.78-inch fhd+ 120hz display is rare for this price, while Motorola razr (2023) stands out with most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Consider that TCL 50 XL 5G ultrawide camera is low resolution (5mp) and muddy. Meanwhile, Motorola razr (2023) external display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike razr+). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
