Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the budget option, but its 165Hz refresh rate can provide smooth gameplay for casual gamers. In contrast, the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor aims for the competitive edge with its blazing 360Hz refresh rate. After using both, the difference in performance is stark. The BenQ's 360Hz refresh rate offers unrivaled motion clarity in fast-paced games, while the Acer's IPS panel offers better color accuracy for mixed use, even if it struggles with brightness at 250 nits in well-lit rooms. Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 24.5" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 360 Hz.
Why compare these? The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor (budget-friendly) and BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor (premium flagship) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Acer Nitro | BenQ ZOWIE |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (4,309 reviews) | 4.5★ (254 reviews) |
| Top Strength | IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use | 360Hz refresh rate on a Fast TN panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports |
| Main Drawback | Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only) | TN panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to IPS/OLED alternatives |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Flagship |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
24.5" Viewable (25" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
TN (Fast TN)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
| Criterion | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor | BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(4,309)Amazon | ★4.5(254)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 24.5" Viewable (25" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | TN (Fast TN) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock) | 360 Hz |
Response Time | 2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min) | 0.5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 320 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | Not specified (Standard sRGB coverage) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 8-bit |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | Variable Refresh Rate (DyAc+ must be OFF) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 170° (H) / 160° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | No (None) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x Mini-USB (for S-Switch only) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Height (155mm), Tilt (-5° to 23°), Swivel (-45° to 45°), Pivot (90°) |
Power Consumption | 20 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 40 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 4,930 g (10.87 lbs) | 6,200 g (13.67 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock)
2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min)
Pros
- IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
- 165Hz overclockable refresh rate provides smooth motion for competitive gaming
Cons
- Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
- Peak brightness (250 nits) is standard and may struggle in bright rooms
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
24.5" Viewable (25" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
TN (Fast TN)
360 Hz
0.5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 360Hz refresh rate on a Fast TN panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports
- DyAc+ technology drastically reduces motion blur (strobing), giving a competitive edge in shooters like CS2/Valorant
Cons
- TN panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to IPS/OLED alternatives
- DyAc+ cannot be used simultaneously with Variable Refresh Rate (FreeSync/G-Sync)
Which one is better?
The BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 360Hz refresh rate crushes the Acer's 165Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor if: you want a budget-friendly option for casual gaming, appreciate better color accuracy for mixed use, or need a lightweight monitor for easy setup. (23.8" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor if: you are a competitive gamer needing the fastest refresh rate, want the best motion clarity in esports titles, or prefer a fully adjustable ergonomic setup. (24.5" display, 360 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 4,309 reviews vs 254
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose BenQ ZOWIE
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.5★. However, BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor or BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor?
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use. BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor wins if you value 360hz refresh rate on a fast tn panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.5★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor and BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor?
Key differences: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor offers ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use, while BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor stands out with 360hz refresh rate on a fast tn panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports. Consider that Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (tilt only). Meanwhile, BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor tn panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to ips/oled alternatives. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.