Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
If you're deciding between the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor and the LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor, the former shines for gaming with a 165Hz refresh rate compared to just 60Hz on the latter. In real-world use, the Nitro's gaming performance is impressive, making it the budget option for gamers. However, the DualUp's unique aspect ratio and better color accuracy are game-changers for creators who need that extra vertical space and sharp colors, especially in photography and design work. Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 27.6" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor (budget-friendly) and LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor (premium flagship) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Acer Nitro | LG DualUp |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (4,309 reviews) | ✓4.7★ (36 reviews) |
| Top Strength | IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use | Unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap |
| Main Drawback | Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only) | Strictly limited to 60Hz with no VRR, making it poor for gaming |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Flagship |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
27.6" Viewable (28" Class)
2560 x 2880 (SDQHD)
16:18
Nano IPS
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
| Criterion | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor | LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(4,309)Amazon | ★4.7(36)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 27.6" Viewable (28" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 2880 (SDQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:18 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | Nano IPS |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock) | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 300 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 98% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | 2x 7 W (Stereo with MaxxAudio) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x USB-C (90W PD, Data, Video); 2x USB-A 3.0 Downstream; 1x USB-B 2.0 Upstream; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | Yes (90W Power Delivery + Video + Data) |
Kvm | No | Yes (Built-in Auto KVM & PBP) |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Ergo Stand (C-Clamp/Grommet): Extend/Retract (210mm), Swivel (±335°), Pivot (90° CCW), Height (130mm), Tilt (±25°) |
Power Consumption | 20 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 40 W (Typical) / 190 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 4,930 g (10.87 lbs) | 9,000 g (19.8 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock)
2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min)
Pros
- IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
- 165Hz overclockable refresh rate provides smooth motion for competitive gaming
Cons
- Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
- Peak brightness (250 nits) is standard and may struggle in bright rooms
LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
27.6" Viewable (28" Class)
2560 x 2880 (SDQHD)
16:18
Nano IPS
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap
- Nano IPS panel covers 98% DCI-P3, offering professional-grade color accuracy for creators
Cons
- Strictly limited to 60Hz with no VRR, making it poor for gaming
- Unconventional aspect ratio (2560x2880) may require scaling tweaks in macOS/Windows
Which one is better?
The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 165Hz refresh rate crushes the LG DualUp's 60Hz. That said, grab the LG DualUp if you need a large vertical workspace for productivity - it's 27.6" vs 23.8".
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor if: you game frequently, need a budget-friendly option, or prefer a high refresh rate. (23.8" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor if: you work with graphics, require more vertical screen space, or need USB-C connectivity for charging. (27.6" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose LG DualUp
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 4,309 reviews vs 36
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG DualUp
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor leads with a 4.7★ rating versus 4.6★. That said, Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor or LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor?
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use. LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor wins if you value unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.7★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor and LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor?
Key differences: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor offers ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use, while LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor stands out with unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap. Consider that Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (tilt only). Meanwhile, LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor strictly limited to 60hz with no vrr, making it poor for gaming. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.