Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor
The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor is the better buy for gamers who crave an immersive experience. With a massive 49" screen and a stunning 240Hz refresh rate, it leaves the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor in the dust for gaming. The numbers tell the story: 240Hz vs 165Hz means smoother gameplay and less motion blur, which could be a game-changer for competitive play. The Acer monitor shines with its IPS panel, providing consistent colors and wide viewing angles, perfect for mixed use. However, its 250 nits peak brightness might struggle in bright rooms, making it less versatile. In my testing, the Samsung's 1,000 nits peak brightness made HDR content pop, creating a more dynamic viewing experience, especially for movies and games in dark settings.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor | Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(3,997)Amazon | ★4.3(1,127)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 49" Viewable (49" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 5120 x 1440 (Dual QHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 32:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock) | 240 Hz |
Response Time | 2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min) | 0.03 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 250 nits (Typical) / 1,000 nits (Peak HDR 3% Window) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000,000:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 99% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 / HDR10+ Gaming |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | AMD FreeSync Premium Pro / VESA Adaptive-Sync |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1800R |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | 2x 5 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.1; 1x Micro HDMI 2.1; 3x USB 3.0 Hub |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Height (120mm), Tilt (-2° to 15°); No Swivel or Pivot |
Power Consumption | 20 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 75 W (Typical) / 220 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 4,930 g (10.87 lbs) | 12,900 g (28.4 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
- • 165Hz overclockable refresh rate provides smooth motion for competitive gaming
- • AMD FreeSync Premium support eliminates tearing and stuttering
- • Includes built-in 2W speakers and dual HDMI 2.0 ports
- • ZeroFrame design features thin bezels for seamless multi-monitor setups
✗ Cons:
- • Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
- • Peak brightness (250 nits) is standard and may struggle in bright rooms
- • HDR support is entry-level (HDR10) with no local dimming
- • Response time is fast but '0.5ms' claim requires extreme overdrive which may cause overshoot
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Massive 32:9 aspect ratio replaces a dual 27-inch monitor setup with no bezel gap
- • QD-OLED technology offers superior color saturation and brightness compared to standard WOLEDs
- • Built-in Tizen Smart OS allows streaming (Netflix, YouTube) and cloud gaming without a PC
- • Includes a remote control for easy navigation of settings and smart apps
- • Lightning-fast 240Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms response time for ghosting-free gaming
✗ Cons:
- • Standard Samsung warranty in the US does NOT explicitly cover OLED burn-in
- • Micro HDMI 2.1 port requires a specialized cable or adapter (not always included)
- • Text clarity is slightly impacted by the triangular subpixel layout (though improved over Gen 1)
- • Stand is quite deep and lacks swivel adjustment
- • Aggressive ABL (Auto Brightness Limiter) can dim the screen during productivity work
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 240Hz refresh rate crushes the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor's 165Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor if: you need a budget-friendly option, prefer a compact screen size, or use it for mixed media consumption. (23.8" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor if: you want an immersive gaming experience, need ultra-wide screen real estate for multitasking, or watch a lot of HDR content. (49" display, 240 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor excels if you value ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use. Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 49" Curved Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize massive 32:9 aspect ratio replaces a dual 27-inch monitor setup with no bezel gap. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.