← Back to Monitors
2026 comparison
Updated Jan 6, 2026
|Sources: Amazon, Manufacturer

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

The Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor crushes the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor in display quality and resolution: 3440 x 1440 vs 1920 x 1080. In real-world use, that means stunning visuals and wider viewing angles, thanks to its QD-OLED panel. However, if you're a competitive gamer, the BenQ's 360Hz refresh rate is a game-changer for fast-paced titles. The Alienware's 165Hz refresh rate is more than enough for most gaming scenarios, especially when paired with its instantaneous 0.1ms response time. This monitor also boasts a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio, ensuring rich colors and deep blacks, making it ideal for immersive gaming and cinematic experiences. So, for 2026, if you're prioritizing vibrant visuals, the Alienware is a no-brainer, while the BenQ is tailored for pro-level esports performance.

📱 Display: 34.18" vs 24.5"⚡ Refresh: 165 Hz vs 360 Hz⚖️ Weight: 340.39 oz vs 218.70 oz

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
Screen Size:34.18" Viewable (34" Class)
Resolution:3440 x 1440 (UWQHD)
Aspect Ratio:21:9
Screen Type:QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED)
Check Amazon Price
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
Screen Size:24.5" Viewable (25" Class)
Resolution:1920 x 1080 (FHD)
Aspect Ratio:16:9
Screen Type:TN (Fast TN)
Check Amazon Price
Key spec differences

Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.

Display2 specs
Refresh Rate
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI 2.0)
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
360 HzWinner
Resolution
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
3440 x 1440 (UWQHD)
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
+

Full specs, pros, and cons

Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.

Comparison: Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

4.8(1,501)Best Buy
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

4.5(254)Amazon
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

Rating:4.8(1,501)Best Buy
Screen Size:34.18" Viewable (34" Class)
Resolution:3440 x 1440 (UWQHD)
Aspect Ratio:21:9
Screen Type:QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED)
Refresh Rate:165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI 2.0)
Response Time:0.1 ms (GtG)
Brightness:250 nits (Typical SDR) / 1,000 nits (Peak HDR)
Contrast:1,000,000:1 (Infinite)
Color Gamut:99.3% DCI-P3 / 149% sRGB
Color Depth:1.07 Billion (10-bit)
HDR:VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 (Peak 1000 Mode available)
Adaptive Sync:AMD FreeSync Premium Pro (VRR 48-165Hz)
Viewing Angles:178° (H) / 178° (V)
Curvature:1800R
Speakers:No (None)
Ports:2x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.0; 1x USB-B Upstream; 4x USB-A Downstream (5 Gbps); 1x Audio Line-out; 1x Headphone Out
USB C:No
Kvm:No
Vesa:100 x 100 mm
Ergonomics:Height (110mm), Swivel (-20° to 20°), Tilt (-5° to 21°), Slant (-5° to 5°)
Power Consumption:34 W (Typical) / 200 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby)
Weight With Stand:9,650 g (21.27 lbs)

✓ Pros:

  • QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast and perfect blacks with no blooming
  • Instantaneous 0.1ms response time ensures zero motion blur in fast-paced games
  • Includes a 3-year manufacturer warranty that explicitly covers OLED burn-in
  • Glossy screen coating makes colors appear significantly more vibrant than matte equivalents
  • Quieter operation than the 'DW' model (uses a single fan vs. two)

✗ Cons:

  • HDMI port is version 2.0, limiting native resolution output to 100Hz (console support varies)
  • Non-standard triangular subpixel layout can cause text fringing (purple/green edges) on text
  • OLED panels carry a risk of burn-in with static elements (though mitigated by pixel shift tech)
  • Raised black levels can occur in bright rooms due to the lack of a polarizing layer

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Check Price on Amazon
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

Rating:4.5(254)Amazon
Screen Size:24.5" Viewable (25" Class)
Resolution:1920 x 1080 (FHD)
Aspect Ratio:16:9
Screen Type:TN (Fast TN)
Refresh Rate:360 Hz
Response Time:0.5 ms (GtG)
Brightness:320 nits (Typical)
Contrast:1,000:1 (Typical)
Color Gamut:Not specified (Standard sRGB coverage)
Color Depth:8-bit
HDR:No (Not supported)
Adaptive Sync:Variable Refresh Rate (DyAc+ must be OFF)
Viewing Angles:170° (H) / 160° (V)
Curvature:Flat
Speakers:No (None)
Ports:1x DisplayPort 1.4; 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x Mini-USB (for S-Switch only)
USB C:No
Kvm:No
Vesa:100 x 100 mm
Ergonomics:Height (155mm), Tilt (-5° to 23°), Swivel (-45° to 45°), Pivot (90°)
Power Consumption:40 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby)
Weight With Stand:6,200 g (13.67 lbs)

✓ Pros:

  • 360Hz refresh rate on a Fast TN panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports
  • DyAc+ technology drastically reduces motion blur (strobing), giving a competitive edge in shooters like CS2/Valorant
  • Includes S-Switch puck for instant profile switching and Shielding Hoods to block distractions
  • Fully adjustable stand with height markers allows for consistent ergonomic setup at tournaments
  • XL Setting to Share allows users to download and apply pro players' exact monitor settings

✗ Cons:

  • TN panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to IPS/OLED alternatives
  • DyAc+ cannot be used simultaneously with Variable Refresh Rate (FreeSync/G-Sync)
  • 1080p resolution is low for general productivity or media consumption
  • No USB-C or modern connectivity features outside of pure video inputs

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Check Price on Amazon

Which one is better?

The Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 3440 x 1440 resolution crushes the BenQ's 1920 x 1080. That said, grab the BenQ if you need a super high refresh rate for competitive gaming - it's 360Hz vs 165Hz, which can be a game-changer in shooters.

Who should buy each?

Choose the Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor if: you want stunning visuals with a 3440 x 1440 resolution, prefer deep contrast for immersive gaming, or need a monitor that excels in color accuracy.
Choose the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor if: you play competitive FPS games and need a blistering 360Hz refresh rate, want minimal motion blur with DyAc+ technology, or prefer a lightweight monitor for easy transport.

Conclusion

We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.

Frequently Asked Questions

+Which has better value?

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor excels if you value qd-oled panel delivers infinite contrast and perfect blacks with no blooming. BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor is better if you prioritize 360hz refresh rate on a fast tn panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports. Pick based on your budget and daily use.

+Is this an independent review?

Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.

+Do newer models exist?

Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.

Affiliate disclosure

PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.