AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core i5-13400F
The AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz is the more premium option here, thanks to its impressive integrated Radeon 780M graphics, which can handle 1080p gaming without a dedicated GPU. In real-world use, this means you can dive into games right away without needing to spend extra on a graphics card, making it a no-brainer for casual gamers. This translates to better efficiency when running multiple applications, especially in a workstation build, where the extra cores really shine in productivity tasks. Key specs: Cores/Threads: 8C/16T vs 10C/16T and Boost Clock: 5.1 GHz vs 4.6 GHz.
Why compare these? Both the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i5-13400F are mid-range processors competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for mid-range features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | AMD Ryzen | Intel Core |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (579 reviews) | 4.6★ (660 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming | Excellent price-to-performance ratio for budget gaming/workstation builds |
| Main Drawback | PCIe 4.0 only (no PCIe 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for GPU) | Locked multiplier prevents overclocking |
| Market Position | Mid-range | Mid-range |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
8 Cores / 16 Threads
4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
Intel Core i5-13400F
13th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake / Alder Lake Refresh)
LGA1700
10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) / 16 threads
P-core 2.5 GHz base / 4.6 GHz turbo; E-core 1.8 GHz base / 3.3 GHz turbo
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Intel Core i5-13400F
| Criterion | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | Intel Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(579)Amazon | ★4.6(660)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point) | 13th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake / Alder Lake Refresh) |
Socket Platform | Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) | LGA1700 |
Cores Threads | 8 Cores / 16 Threads | 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) / 16 threads |
Base Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost | P-core 2.5 GHz base / 4.6 GHz turbo; E-core 1.8 GHz base / 3.3 GHz turbo |
Cache L2 L3 | 8 MB L2 + 16 MB L3 (24 MB Total) | 9.5 MB L2 + 20 MB Intel Smart Cache (29.5 MB total) |
TDP Power | 65 W | 65W Processor Base Power |
Max Turbo Power | 88 W (PPT) | 148W Maximum Turbo Power (PL2) |
Process Node | TSMC 4nm FinFET (Monolithic Die) | Intel 7 (10nm Enhanced SuperFin) |
Memory Support | DDR5-5200 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 256 GB; ECC Support: No | Up to 192GB; DDR5-4800 (native) or DDR4-3200; ECC supported (W680 chipset only) |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~83.2 GB/s @ 5200 MT/s) | Up to 76.8 GB/s (DDR5) |
Pcie Version | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pcie Lanes | 20 Total (16 Usable: x8 Graphics, 2x4 NVMe/General) | 20 total (16x Gen 5 + 4x Gen 4) |
Igpu | AMD Radeon 780M (12 Compute Units, 2900 MHz) | None (discrete graphics card required) |
Instruction Features | AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, AES-NI, SHA, SSE4.1/4.2 | Intel 64; SSE4.1; SSE4.2; AVX2; AES-NI; VT-x; VT-d; GNA 3.0 |
Cooler Included | Yes (Wraith Spire) | Yes (Intel Laminar RM1 Cooler included) |
Max Temp | 95°C (203°F) TjMax | 100°C (Tjunction) |
Notes Limits | Features 'Ryzen AI' NPU (16 TOPS). Monolithic design has less L3 cache than chiplet Ryzen 7000. Discrete GPU slot limited to PCIe 4.0 x8 speed (sufficient for most mid-range GPUs). | Locked multiplier (no overclocking); F-series requires discrete GPU; widely compatible with B660/B760 motherboards |
Chipset Support | A620, B650, B650E, X670, X670E, B840, B850, X870, X870E | Intel 600 Series (H610, B660, H670, Z690) and 700 Series (B760, H770, Z790) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
8 Cores / 16 Threads
4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
8 MB L2 + 16 MB L3 (24 MB Total)
65 W
Pros
- Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming
- Includes dedicated NPU for local AI workloads (Ryzen AI)
Cons
- PCIe 4.0 only (no PCIe 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for GPU)
- Small L3 cache (16MB) limits performance with high-end discrete GPUs
Intel Core i5-13400F
13th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake / Alder Lake Refresh)
LGA1700
10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) / 16 threads
P-core 2.5 GHz base / 4.6 GHz turbo; E-core 1.8 GHz base / 3.3 GHz turbo
9.5 MB L2 + 20 MB Intel Smart Cache (29.5 MB total)
65W Processor Base Power
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio for budget gaming/workstation builds
- Hybrid architecture (6P+4E) destroys older 6-core CPUs in multitasking
Cons
- Locked multiplier prevents overclocking
- No integrated graphics (troubleshooting is harder without a spare GPU)
Which one is better?
The AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz is the better buy for most people - its integrated Radeon 780M graphics crushes the Intel Core i5-13400F, letting you game without a dedicated GPU. That said, grab the i5-13400F if you need more cores for heavy multitasking - it's more efficient in that area with 10 cores compared to 8.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz if: you want to play games at 1080p without a dedicated graphics card, need efficient performance with a low TDP of 65W, or are looking for an APU that handles local AI workloads with its dedicated NPU.
Choose the Intel Core i5-13400F if: you plan on building a workstation for productivity, need a CPU that excels in multitasking with 10 cores, or want to save money on your initial build by investing in a discrete GPU later.
Best-in-class integrated graphics Priority
Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming
→ Choose AMD Ryzen
Excellent price-to-performance ratio Priority
Excellent price-to-performance ratio for budget gaming/workstation builds
→ Choose Intel Core
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.6★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G or Intel Core i5-13400F?
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is the better choice if you prioritize best-in-class integrated graphics (radeon 780m) capable of 1080p gaming. Intel Core i5-13400F wins if you value excellent price-to-performance ratio for budget gaming/workstation builds. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i5-13400F?
Key differences: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G offers best-in-class integrated graphics (radeon 780m) capable of 1080p gaming, while Intel Core i5-13400F stands out with excellent price-to-performance ratio for budget gaming/workstation builds. Consider that AMD Ryzen 7 8700G pcie 4.0 only (no pcie 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for gpu). Meanwhile, Intel Core i5-13400F locked multiplier prevents overclocking. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: February 7, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.