AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core i5-14400F
Get the AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz unless you need extra cores. It boasts a max turbo clock of 5.1GHz, compared to the Intel Core i5-14400F's 4.7GHz. This makes it a powerhouse for gaming and demanding applications in 2026. While the Ryzen 7 306.9 oz excels in clock speed and integrated graphics, the Intel Core i5-14400F offers more cores with its 10C/16T setup. If you're into multitasking or using heavy applications, those extra cores could make a difference in day-to-day performance. Key specs: Core Count: 8C/16T vs 10C/16T and Max Turbo Clock: 5.1GHz vs 4.7GHz.
Why compare these? Both the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i5-14400F are mid-range processors competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for mid-range features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | AMD Ryzen | Intel Core |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (579 reviews) | ✓4.8★ (502 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming | Solid multi-core performance for the price (10 cores/16 threads) |
| Main Drawback | PCIe 4.0 only (no PCIe 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for GPU) | Minimal performance gain over the cheaper i5-13400F |
| Market Position | Mid-range | Mid-range |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
8 Cores / 16 Threads
4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
Intel Core i5-14400F
14th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake Refresh)
FCLGA1700 (LGA1700)
10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) / 16 threads
P-core 2.5 GHz base / 4.7 GHz turbo; E-core 1.8 GHz base / 3.5 GHz turbo
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core i5-14400F
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Intel Core i5-14400F
| Criterion | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(579)Amazon | ★4.8(502)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point) | 14th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake Refresh) |
Socket Platform | Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) | FCLGA1700 (LGA1700) |
Cores Threads | 8 Cores / 16 Threads | 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) / 16 threads |
Base Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost | P-core 2.5 GHz base / 4.7 GHz turbo; E-core 1.8 GHz base / 3.5 GHz turbo |
Cache L2 L3 | 8 MB L2 + 16 MB L3 (24 MB Total) | 9.5 MB L2 + 20 MB Intel Smart Cache (29.5 MB total) |
TDP Power | 65 W | 65W Processor Base Power |
Max Turbo Power | 88 W (PPT) | 148W Maximum Turbo Power (PL2) |
Process Node | TSMC 4nm FinFET (Monolithic Die) | Intel 7 (10nm Enhanced SuperFin) |
Memory Support | DDR5-5200 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 256 GB; ECC Support: No | Up to 192GB; DDR5-4800 (native) or DDR4-3200; ECC supported (W680 chipset only) |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~83.2 GB/s @ 5200 MT/s) | Up to 76.8 GB/s (DDR5) |
Pcie Version | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pcie Lanes | 20 Total (16 Usable: x8 Graphics, 2x4 NVMe/General) | 20 total (16x Gen 5 + 4x Gen 4) |
Igpu | AMD Radeon 780M (12 Compute Units, 2900 MHz) | None (discrete graphics card required) |
Instruction Features | AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, AES-NI, SHA, SSE4.1/4.2 | Intel 64; SSE4.1; SSE4.2; AVX2; AES-NI; VT-x; VT-d; GNA 3.0 |
Cooler Included | Yes (Wraith Spire) | Yes (Intel Laminar RM1 Cooler included) |
Max Temp | 95°C (203°F) TjMax | 100°C (Tjunction) |
Notes Limits | Features 'Ryzen AI' NPU (16 TOPS). Monolithic design has less L3 cache than chiplet Ryzen 7000. Discrete GPU slot limited to PCIe 4.0 x8 speed (sufficient for most mid-range GPUs). | Locked multiplier (no overclocking); Memory speed locked to DDR5-4800 on most boards due to SA voltage limits; requires discrete GPU |
Chipset Support | A620, B650, B650E, X670, X670E, B840, B850, X870, X870E | Intel 600 Series and 700 Series chipsets (LGA1700) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
8 Cores / 16 Threads
4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
8 MB L2 + 16 MB L3 (24 MB Total)
65 W
Pros
- Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming
- Includes dedicated NPU for local AI workloads (Ryzen AI)
Cons
- PCIe 4.0 only (no PCIe 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for GPU)
- Small L3 cache (16MB) limits performance with high-end discrete GPUs
Intel Core i5-14400F
14th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake Refresh)
FCLGA1700 (LGA1700)
10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) / 16 threads
P-core 2.5 GHz base / 4.7 GHz turbo; E-core 1.8 GHz base / 3.5 GHz turbo
9.5 MB L2 + 20 MB Intel Smart Cache (29.5 MB total)
65W Processor Base Power
Pros
- Solid multi-core performance for the price (10 cores/16 threads)
- Includes boxed thermal solution (Intel Laminar RM1)
Cons
- Minimal performance gain over the cheaper i5-13400F
- DDR5 support is effectively locked to 4800 MT/s (unlike 'K' series chips)
Which one is better?
The AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz is the better buy for most people - its 5.1GHz turbo clock crushes the Intel Core i5-14400F's 4.7GHz. That said, grab the Intel if you need more cores for multitasking - it's good for handling heavy workloads with 10 cores.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz if: you want superior clock speed for gaming, you prefer integrated graphics over a discrete GPU, or you need efficient performance with a 65W TDP.
Choose the Intel Core i5-14400F if: you plan to run multiple applications simultaneously, you need a system that supports DDR4 for cost savings, or you want a longer upgrade path with PCIe 5.0.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Intel Core
Best-in-class integrated graphics Priority
Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming
→ Choose AMD Ryzen
Solid multi-core performance Priority
Solid multi-core performance for the price (10 cores/16 threads)
→ Choose Intel Core
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: The Intel Core i5-14400F leads with a 4.8★ rating versus 4.6★. That said, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G or Intel Core i5-14400F?
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is the better choice if you prioritize best-in-class integrated graphics (radeon 780m) capable of 1080p gaming. Intel Core i5-14400F wins if you value solid multi-core performance for the price (10 cores/16 threads). Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.8★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i5-14400F?
Key differences: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G offers best-in-class integrated graphics (radeon 780m) capable of 1080p gaming, while Intel Core i5-14400F stands out with solid multi-core performance for the price (10 cores/16 threads). Consider that AMD Ryzen 7 8700G pcie 4.0 only (no pcie 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for gpu). Meanwhile, Intel Core i5-14400F minimal performance gain over the cheaper i5-13400f. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: February 7, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.