AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is the premium option here, boasting best-in-class integrated graphics that can handle 1080p gaming. In real-world use, the 780M GPU makes it a no-brainer for casual gamers. However, if you're seeking modern connectivity and power efficiency, the Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K shines with its 5.2 GHz boost clock and PCIe 5.0 lanes. After comparing the specs, the 14 cores in the Intel processor give it an edge for multitasking and demanding applications. The 125W TDP, while higher, allows for impressive performance under load, especially with its support for DDR5-6400 RAM. So, if you're into heavy workloads or gaming at high settings, the Intel might be worth considering despite its slightly lower integrated graphics performance.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
| Criterion | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(554)Amazon | ★4.5(111)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point) | Arrow Lake-S (Core Ultra Series 2) |
Socket Platform | Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) | LGA1851 |
Cores Threads | 8 Cores / 16 Threads | 14 Cores (6 Performance + 8 Efficient) / 14 Threads |
Base Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost | P-core: 4.2–5.2 GHz / E-core: 3.6–4.6 GHz |
Cache L2 L3 | 8 MB L2 + 16 MB L3 (24 MB Total) | 24 MB Intel® Smart Cache (L3) + 26 MB L2 (50 MB Total) |
TDP Power | 65 W | 125 W (Processor Base Power) |
Max Turbo Power | 88 W (PPT) | 159 W (Maximum Turbo Power) |
Process Node | TSMC 4nm FinFET (Monolithic Die) | TSMC N3B (Compute Tile) / TSMC N6 (SoC Tile) |
Memory Support | DDR5-5200 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 256 GB; ECC Support: No | DDR5-6400 MT/s (Official); CUDIMM Support; Up to 192 GB |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~83.2 GB/s @ 5200 MT/s) | 102.4 GB/s (at DDR5-6400) |
Pcie Version | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pcie Lanes | 20 Total (16 Usable: x8 Graphics, 2x4 NVMe/General) | 24 (20 PCIe 5.0 + 4 PCIe 4.0 Direct from CPU) |
Igpu | AMD Radeon 780M (12 Compute Units, 2900 MHz) | Intel® Graphics (4 Xe-cores, 1.9 GHz Max Dynamic) |
Instruction Features | AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, AES-NI, SHA, SSE4.1/4.2 | SSE4.2, AVX2, VNNI, Intel 64, VT-x/d; NPU (13 TOPS AI) |
Cooler Included | Yes (Wraith Spire) | No (Heatsink not included) |
Max Temp | 95°C (203°F) TjMax | 105°C (221°F) Max Operating Temperature |
Notes Limits | Features 'Ryzen AI' NPU (16 TOPS). Monolithic design has less L3 cache than chiplet Ryzen 7000. Discrete GPU slot limited to PCIe 4.0 x8 speed (sufficient for most mid-range GPUs). | Requires LGA1851 motherboard (800 Series). No Hyper-Threading. Includes dedicated NPU for AI workloads. |
Chipset Support | A620, B650, B650E, X670, X670E, B840, B850, X870, X870E | Intel 800 Series (Z890, B860, H810, etc.) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
✓ Pros:
- • Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming
- • Includes dedicated NPU for local AI workloads (Ryzen AI)
- • Efficient 65W operation with included Wraith Spire cooler
✗ Cons:
- • PCIe 4.0 only (no PCIe 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for GPU)
- • Small L3 cache (16MB) limits performance with high-end discrete GPUs
- • ECC memory not supported (unlike standard Ryzen 7000/9000 CPUs)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
✓ Pros:
- • Significantly improved power efficiency (performance-per-watt) vs. 14th Gen
- • Modern platform connectivity: Native Thunderbolt 4, WiFi 7, PCIe 5.0 lanes
- • Integrated NPU (13 TOPS) accelerates light local AI workloads
- • Run cooler than previous i5-K SKUs under load
✗ Cons:
- • Gaming performance often flat or slightly lower than 14600K/Ryzen 9000
- • Removal of Hyper-Threading reduces multi-core potential in some apps
- • Requires new LGA1851 socket (incompatible with LGA1700)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K is the better buy for most people - its 14 cores crush the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 8 cores for multitasking. That said, grab the AMD if you want top-notch integrated graphics for gaming - it's a real gem at 1080p.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G if: you want exceptional integrated graphics for gaming, you need a lower TDP for quieter operation, or you plan to handle light AI workloads.
Choose the Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K if: you require more cores for multi-threaded tasks, you want the latest connectivity options like PCIe 5.0, or you prefer better performance in demanding applications.
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G excels if you value best-in-class integrated graphics (radeon 780m) capable of 1080p gaming. Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K is better if you prioritize significantly improved power efficiency (performance-per-watt) vs. 14th gen. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.