AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
The AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz is the mid-range option here, but its integrated Radeon 780M graphics can handle 1080p gaming like a champ. Meanwhile, the Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K shines with its 20 cores, making it a powerhouse for productivity tasks in 2026. In real-world use, the Ryzen 7 306.9 oz's 65W TDP means cooler operation, but it lacks the advanced PCIe 5.0 support that the Intel processor offers. With 30MB of L3 cache, Intel's chip provides significantly better multitasking capabilities, crucial for heavy workloads. Key specs: TDP: 65W (AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz) vs 125W (Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K) and Cores/Threads: 8C/16T (AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz) vs 20C/20T (Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K).
Why compare these? The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (mid-range) and Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K (high-end) represent different approaches to processors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | AMD Ryzen | Intel Core |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (579 reviews) | ✓4.7★ (1,014 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming | High energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks |
| Main Drawback | PCIe 4.0 only (no PCIe 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for GPU) | Gaming performance often trails previous Gen (14700K) and AMD X3D |
| Market Position | Mid-range | ✓Premium |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
8 Cores / 16 Threads
4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
Arrow Lake-S (Intel Core Ultra Series 2)
FCLGA1851 (LGA1851)
20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) / 20 threads (No Hyper-Threading)
P-core 3.9 GHz base / 5.5 GHz boost; E-core 3.3 GHz base / 4.6 GHz boost
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
| Criterion | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(579)Amazon | ★4.7(1,014)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point) | Arrow Lake-S (Intel Core Ultra Series 2) |
Socket Platform | Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) | FCLGA1851 (LGA1851) |
Cores Threads | 8 Cores / 16 Threads | 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) / 20 threads (No Hyper-Threading) |
Base Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost | P-core 3.9 GHz base / 5.5 GHz boost; E-core 3.3 GHz base / 4.6 GHz boost |
Cache L2 L3 | 8 MB L2 + 16 MB L3 (24 MB Total) | 36 MB L2 + 30 MB Intel Smart Cache (66 MB Total) |
TDP Power | 65 W | 125W Processor Base Power |
Max Turbo Power | 88 W (PPT) | 250W Maximum Turbo Power (PL2) |
Process Node | TSMC 4nm FinFET (Monolithic Die) | TSMC N3B (Compute Tile) + TSMC N6 (SoC Tile) |
Memory Support | DDR5-5200 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 256 GB; ECC Support: No | Up to 192GB DDR5; Native DDR5-6400 (CUDIMM supported); ECC supported (W880 chipset only) |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~83.2 GB/s @ 5200 MT/s) | Up to 102.4 GB/s |
Pcie Version | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pcie Lanes | 20 Total (16 Usable: x8 Graphics, 2x4 NVMe/General) | 24 usable (20x PCIe 5.0 + 4x PCIe 4.0) |
Igpu | AMD Radeon 780M (12 Compute Units, 2900 MHz) | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores, up to 2.0 GHz) |
Instruction Features | AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, AES-NI, SHA, SSE4.1/4.2 | Intel 64; AVX2; VNNI; Intel DL Boost; NPU 3 (13 TOPS) |
Cooler Included | Yes (Wraith Spire) | No (thermal solution not included) |
Max Temp | 95°C (203°F) TjMax | 105°C (Tjmax) |
Notes Limits | Features 'Ryzen AI' NPU (16 TOPS). Monolithic design has less L3 cache than chiplet Ryzen 7000. Discrete GPU slot limited to PCIe 4.0 x8 speed (sufficient for most mid-range GPUs). | First enthusiast Intel CPU without Hyper-Threading; requires LGA1851 motherboard (800 Series); 13 TOPS NPU for local AI acceleration |
Chipset Support | A620, B650, B650E, X670, X670E, B840, B850, X870, X870E | Intel Z890, B860, H810, W880 |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Zen 4 (Ryzen 8000G Series / Hawk Point)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
8 Cores / 16 Threads
4.2 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
8 MB L2 + 16 MB L3 (24 MB Total)
65 W
Pros
- Best-in-class integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming
- Includes dedicated NPU for local AI workloads (Ryzen AI)
Cons
- PCIe 4.0 only (no PCIe 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for GPU)
- Small L3 cache (16MB) limits performance with high-end discrete GPUs
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
Arrow Lake-S (Intel Core Ultra Series 2)
FCLGA1851 (LGA1851)
20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) / 20 threads (No Hyper-Threading)
P-core 3.9 GHz base / 5.5 GHz boost; E-core 3.3 GHz base / 4.6 GHz boost
36 MB L2 + 30 MB Intel Smart Cache (66 MB Total)
125W Processor Base Power
Pros
- High energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks
- Native support for fast DDR5-6400 memory and PCIe 5.0
Cons
- Gaming performance often trails previous Gen (14700K) and AMD X3D
- Requires new LGA1851 motherboard (no backward compatibility)
Which one is better?
The Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K is the better buy for most people - its 20 cores crush the AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz's 8 cores. That said, grab the Ryzen if you need excellent integrated graphics for gaming - it's a solid 1080p option.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 306.9 oz if: you want to game comfortably at 1080p, need a cooler processor for compact builds, or prefer an all-in-one solution without a discrete GPU.
Choose the Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K if: you tackle multi-threaded tasks often, require the latest connectivity with PCIe 5.0, or need maximum performance for productivity applications.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Intel Core
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 1,014 reviews vs 579
→ Choose Intel Core
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Intel Core
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose AMD Ryzen
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: The Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K leads with a 4.7★ rating versus 4.6★. That said, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G or Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K?
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is the better choice if you prioritize best-in-class integrated graphics (radeon 780m) capable of 1080p gaming. Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K wins if you value high energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.7★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K?
Key differences: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G offers best-in-class integrated graphics (radeon 780m) capable of 1080p gaming, while Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K stands out with high energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks. Consider that AMD Ryzen 7 8700G pcie 4.0 only (no pcie 5.0) and reduced lane count (x8 for gpu). Meanwhile, Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K gaming performance often trails previous gen (14700k) and amd x3d. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: February 7, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.