AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
The AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor crushes the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor for gaming, boasting a rapid 165Hz refresh rate compared to the BenQ's 60Hz. This makes gameplay significantly smoother and more responsive, especially in fast-paced games. If you're into competitive gaming in 2026, the AOC is the clear standout with its 3000:1 contrast ratio, offering deeper blacks and brighter colors than the BenQ's 1000:1 ratio. In published testing, the AOC's specs translate to a more immersive gaming experience. The 165Hz refresh rate means you'll enjoy buttery smooth visuals, while the BenQ's features cater more to casual users who prioritize eye comfort over performance. If you're serious about gaming, the AOC is worth every penny, especially considering its superior color depth and response time. Key specs: Display: 23.6" vs 23.8" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? Both the AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor are budget-friendly monitors competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for budget-friendly features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
How We Compare These Products
PageBen prioritizes usefulness for US shoppers. Affiliate commission does not decide recommendations, rankings, or verdicts.
Sources Checked
Official specifications, Retailer ratings, Manufacturer documentation, Buyer feedback.
Decision Factors
We weigh panel type, resolution, refresh rate, brightness, color coverage, ergonomics, and desk fit.
Editorial Standard
Research-based analysis from documented specs, published lab measurements, and verified-buyer evidence. Any hands-on note is labeled as such. Full methodology.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | AOC C24G1A | BenQ GW2480 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.7★ (10,257 reviews) | 4.7★ (12,191 reviews) |
| Top Strength | 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming | Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light |
| Main Drawback | No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub) | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming) |
| Market Position | Budget | Budget |
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
| Criterion | AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor | BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(10,257)Amazon | ★4.7(12,191)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.6" Viewable (24" Class) | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | IPS (In-Plane Switching) |
Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 1 ms (MPRT) / 4 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 250 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) / 80,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Native) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 119% sRGB / 88% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) | 72% NTSC (Approx. 100% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium (48-165Hz range via DP) | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1500R | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | 2x 1 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (130mm), Swivel (-30° to 30°), Tilt (-5° to 23°); No Pivot | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) |
Power Consumption | 31 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 16 W (Energy Star) / 27 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 4,510 g (9.94 lbs) | 3,840 g (8.47 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI)
1 ms (MPRT) / 4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming
- High 3,000:1 contrast ratio provides deep blacks superior to IPS panels
Cons
- No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub)
- Ghosting / black smearing is noticeable in dark transitions (typical of budget VA panels)
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
- Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies are certified by TÜV Rheinland
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming)
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
Which one is better?
The AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 165Hz refresh rate crushes the BenQ's 60Hz. That said, grab the BenQ if you want a monitor focused on eye care and comfort - it's 24% lighter at 135.45oz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor if: you want an ultra-smooth gaming experience, need deep blacks and vibrant colors, or play competitive games. (23.6" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor if: you prioritize eye comfort, prefer a tilt-only stand, or watch videos for long periods. (23.8" display, 60 Hz refresh)
165Hz refresh rate Priority
165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming
→ Choose AOC C24G1A
Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' Priority
Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Conclusion
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.7★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor or BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor?
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming. BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor wins if you value exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. Both are rated highly (4.7★ vs 4.7★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor?
Key differences: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor offers 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming, while BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor stands out with exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. Consider that AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor no usb ports (user draft lists 4x usb, but verified retail units lack a usb hub). Meanwhile, BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+What should I prioritize when choosing between these monitors?
Focus on the features that matter most for your daily use. AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor stands out for 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming and high 3,000:1 contrast ratio provides deep blacks superior to ips panels. BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor excels at exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light and flicker-free and low blue light technologies are certified by tüv rheinland. Check the spec table above for the complete side-by-side breakdown.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.