ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor vs Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
If you're diving into the world of gaming monitors, the ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor is the mid-range powerhouse you want, boasting a blistering 165Hz refresh rate. In contrast, the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor offers a more immersive experience with its larger 27" screen and 1800R curvature but settles for a standard 60Hz refresh rate, which is a dealbreaker for hardcore gamers. In my testing, the ASUS monitor's ultra-fast 0.5ms response time practically eliminates motion blur, making it a no-brainer for competitive gaming. However, if you're more into casual use or watching movies, the Samsung's high 3000:1 contrast ratio delivers stunning visuals, especially in darker scenes. So, what's the better buy here? Key specs: Display: 24" vs 26.9" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? The ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor (mid-range) and Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor (entry-level) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | ASUS VG248QG | Samsung CR500 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.5★ (9,209 reviews) | ✓4.6★ (2,830 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Ultra-fast 0.5ms (GtG) response time virtually eliminates motion blur and ghosting | 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion |
| Main Drawback | TN panel viewing angles (170°/160°) cause color shifting when viewed off-center | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming) |
| Market Position | ✓Mid-range | Entry |

ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor
24" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
TN (Twisted Nematic)

Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor vs Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor

ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor

Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
| Criterion | ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor | Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(9,209)Amazon | ★4.6(2,830)Amazon |
Screen Size | 24" Viewable (24" Class) | 26.9" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | TN (Twisted Nematic) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (Overclockable; via DisplayPort) | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 0.5 ms (GtG Min) / 1 ms (GtG Avg) | 4 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 350 nits (cd/m²) | 250 nits (Typical) / 300 nits (Peak) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (ASCR Dynamic) | 3,000:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 99% sRGB) | 72% NTSC (CIE 1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium | AMD FreeSync |
Viewing Angles | 170° (H) / 160° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1800R |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x Dual-Link DVI-D; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA (D-Sub); 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (130mm), Swivel (±90°), Pivot (±90°), Tilt (+33° to -5°) | Tilt only (-2° to 22°) |
Power Consumption | 40 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 35 W (Max) / 0.3 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 5,200 g (11.46 lbs) | 4,300 g (9.48 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor
24" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
TN (Twisted Nematic)
165 Hz (Overclockable; via DisplayPort)
0.5 ms (GtG Min) / 1 ms (GtG Avg)
Pros
- Ultra-fast 0.5ms (GtG) response time virtually eliminates motion blur and ghosting
- 165Hz refresh rate offers competitive fluidity for FPS titles (via DisplayPort)
Cons
- TN panel viewing angles (170°/160°) cause color shifting when viewed off-center
- Color accuracy is inferior to modern IPS panels (washed out blacks/colors)

Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
60 Hz
4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion
- High 3,000:1 contrast ratio delivers deep, rich blacks ideal for movies
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming)
- Stand lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
Which one is better?
The ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its lightning-fast 165Hz refresh rate crushes the Samsung CR500's 60Hz. That said, grab the Samsung if you prefer a larger screen for movies and casual gaming, as it's 3" bigger and offers a more immersive experience.
Who should buy each?
Choose the ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor if: you need ultra-fast response times for competitive gaming, want a higher refresh rate, or play fast-paced FPS titles. (24" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor if: you enjoy watching movies on a bigger screen, prefer curved displays for immersion, or need a monitor for general home and office tasks. (26.9" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 9,209 reviews vs 2,830
→ Choose ASUS VG248QG
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose ASUS VG248QG
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor leads with a 4.6★ rating versus 4.5★. That said, ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor or Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor?
ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ultra-fast 0.5ms (gtg) response time virtually eliminates motion blur and ghosting. Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor wins if you value 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion. Both are rated highly (4.5★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor and Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor?
Key differences: ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor offers ultra-fast 0.5ms (gtg) response time virtually eliminates motion blur and ghosting, while Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor stands out with 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion. Consider that ASUS VG248QG 24" G-SYNC Gaming Monitor tn panel viewing angles (170°/160°) cause color shifting when viewed off-center. Meanwhile, Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
