LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS vs Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD
The LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS and Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD monitors cater to different segments of the gaming and general use markets. The LG model, with its larger 27-inch display and impressive 2560 x 1440 (QHD) resolution, targets more serious gamers and professionals who demand high-resolution visuals and a competitive edge in gaming performance. Its 144Hz refresh rate and G-SYNC compatibility mean smoother gameplay, reducing screen tearing and input lag, crucial for a seamless gaming experience. On the other hand, the Acer Nitro KF240Y is positioned as a more budget-friendly option with its smaller 23.8-inch screen and a 1920 x 1080 (FHD) resolution. While it offers a respectable 100Hz refresh rate, the monitor is more suited for casual gamers or users who prioritize cost-effectiveness and decent performance in a compact form factor. The ZeroFrame design of the Acer model also makes it an appealing choice for those with limited desk space. Both monitors feature IPS panels known for vibrant colors, yet they differ significantly in terms of resolution, refresh rate, and connectivity options, which ultimately influences their target audiences and use cases.
LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS
4.7
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD
4.6
LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS

Size: 27 inches
Resolution: 2560 x 1440 (QHD)
RefreshRate: 144Hz
PanelType: IPS
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD

Size: 23.8 inches
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 (FHD)
RefreshRate: 100Hz
PanelType: IPS
Comparison: LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS vs Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD

LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS

Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD
| Criterion | LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7 | ★4.6 |
| Size | 27 inches | 23.8 inches |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
| RefreshRate | 144Hz | 100Hz |
| PanelType | IPS | IPS |
| ResponseTime | 1ms | 1ms (VRB) |
| Connectivity | HDMI, DisplayPort | 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Check on Amazon→ | Check on Amazon→ |

LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS
✓ Pros:
- • Crisp 1440p resolution
- • Vibrant colors with IPS panel
- • G-SYNC Compatible
✗ Cons:
- • Contrast ratio is low (blacks look gray)
- • No USB-C port

Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD
✓ Pros:
- • Smoother than standard 75Hz monitors
- • Good color accuracy
- • AMD FreeSync Premium
✗ Cons:
- • Brightness is barely adequate
- • Stand lacks ergonomic adjustments
Which one is better?
The LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS wins overall due to its superior resolution (2560 x 1440 vs 1920 x 1080) and higher refresh rate (144Hz vs 100Hz), making it a better choice for serious gaming where performance and visual clarity are paramount.
Who should buy each?
Choose LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS if: - You need a larger screen with higher resolution (27 inches, 2560 x 1440) for detailed visuals. - You prioritize high refresh rates (144Hz) for smooth, competitive gaming. - You require G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. Choose Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD if: - You are looking for a budget-friendly option with decent performance. - You prefer a compact monitor that fits smaller desk spaces. - You want a monitor with AMD FreeSync Premium for tear-free gaming. They're equally matched on: - Both models have a 1ms response time, providing quick pixel transitions crucial for fast-paced gaming. - Both use IPS panels, ensuring vibrant color reproduction.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
FAQs
+ Which has better value?
LG 27GL83A-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD IPS excels if you value crisp 1440p resolution. Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" Full HD is better if you prioritize smoother than standard 75hz monitors. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+ Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+ Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
