LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor vs Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
The LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor is the mid-range powerhouse here, boasting a stunning 2560 x 1440 resolution compared to the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor's 1920 x 1080. In practical terms, that means sharper text and better detail in games and photos, making it the smarter buy for serious gamers or creatives. You also get a 144Hz refresh rate with the LG, which is a game-changer for fast-paced action, while the Samsung is stuck at 60Hz. For daily use, this means smoother visuals and less motion blur, especially when gaming. If you're looking to upgrade in 2026, the LG is worth every penny for its superior specs. Key specs: Display: 27" vs 26.9" and Refresh: 144 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? The LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor (mid-range) and Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor (entry-level) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | LG 27GL83A-B | Samsung CR500 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.5★ (13,197 reviews) | ✓4.6★ (2,830 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Ideal 27-inch QHD sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p | 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion |
| Main Drawback | Contrast ratio is mediocre (IPS glow is visible in dark rooms; blacks appear gray) | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming) |
| Market Position | ✓Mid-range | Entry |
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (QHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor vs Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
| Criterion | LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor | Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(13,197)Amazon | ★4.6(2,830)Amazon |
Screen Size | 27" Viewable (27" Class) | 26.9" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 1 ms (GtG) | 4 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 350 nits (Typical) / 280 nits (Min) | 250 nits (Typical) / 300 nits (Peak) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Typical) / 700:1 (Min) | 3,000:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 72% NTSC (CIE 1976) |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit / 8-bit + FRC) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support only) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium | AMD FreeSync |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1800R |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA (D-Sub); 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (110mm), Pivot (90°), Tilt (-5° to 15°); No Swivel | Tilt only (-2° to 22°) |
Power Consumption | 51 W (Typical) / 65 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 35 W (Max) / 0.3 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 6,100 g (13.5 lbs) | 4,300 g (9.48 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (QHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
144 Hz
1 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Ideal 27-inch QHD sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p
- Fast 1ms IPS panel eliminates motion blur while maintaining vibrant 99% sRGB colors
Cons
- Contrast ratio is mediocre (IPS glow is visible in dark rooms; blacks appear gray)
- Lacks a USB hub and built-in speakers (features found on the pricier '850' model)
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
60 Hz
4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion
- High 3,000:1 contrast ratio delivers deep, rich blacks ideal for movies
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming)
- Stand lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
Which one is better?
The LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 144Hz refresh rate crushes the Samsung CR500's 60Hz. That said, grab the Samsung if you're on a tight budget and only need basic functionality - it's lighter at 151.68 oz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor if: you want sharp 2560 x 1440 resolution, need a 144Hz refresh rate for competitive gaming, or enjoy vibrant colors with 99% sRGB accuracy.
Choose the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor if: you prefer a curved display for immersion, watch movies often with deeper blacks, or need a budget-friendly option with a sleek design. (26.9" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 13,197 reviews vs 2,830
→ Choose LG 27GL83A-B
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 27GL83A-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Conclusion
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor and Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Bottom line: The Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor leads with a 4.6★ rating versus 4.5★. That said, LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor or Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor?
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ideal 27-inch qhd sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p. Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor wins if you value 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion. Both are rated highly (4.5★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor and Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor?
Key differences: LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor offers ideal 27-inch qhd sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p, while Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor stands out with 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion. Consider that LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor contrast ratio is mediocre (ips glow is visible in dark rooms; blacks appear gray). Meanwhile, Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.