LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor vs Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
The LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor is the premium option here, boasting a sharp 2560x1440 resolution that delivers stunning visuals for gaming and productivity. In contrast, the Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor offers a broader 30-inch screen with a 200Hz refresh rate, making it an enticing budget pick for fast-paced gaming. After testing both, the LG's superior resolution means crisp text and detailed images, while the Sceptre's impressive 200Hz refresh rate translates to ultra-smooth gameplay. However, the lower 2560x1080 resolution on the Sceptre can make text appear less sharp—something to consider if you're also using it for work or creative tasks in 2026.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor vs Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor | Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(13,197)Amazon | ★4.5(162)Amazon |
Screen Size | 27" Viewable (27" Class) | 30" Diagonal Viewable |
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) | 2560 x 1080 (WFHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 200 Hz (DisplayPort); 165 Hz (HDMI 2.0); 75 Hz (HDMI 1.4) |
Response Time | 1 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG); 1 ms (MPRT / Blur Reduction) |
Brightness | 350 nits (Typical) / 280 nits (Min) | 320 cd/m² (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Typical) / 700:1 (Min) | 3,000:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 99% sRGB |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit / 8-bit + FRC) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support only) | Yes (HDR400 Signal Support; Edge-lit) |
Adaptive Sync | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1500R |
Speakers | No (None) | Yes (2x 3W, 4Ω) |
Ports | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x DisplayPort 1.2 (200Hz); 1x HDMI 2.0 (165Hz); 2x HDMI 1.4 (75Hz); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (110mm), Pivot (90°), Tilt (-5° to 15°); No Swivel | Height adj. (4.08" - 8.61"); Tilt (-5° to 20°); Swivel (±25°) |
Power Consumption | 51 W (Typical) / 65 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 45 W (Typical); 52 W (Max) |
Weight With Stand | 6,100 g (13.5 lbs) | 6,200 g (13.67 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Ideal 27-inch QHD sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p
- • Fast 1ms IPS panel eliminates motion blur while maintaining vibrant 99% sRGB colors
- • Fully certified 'G-SYNC Compatible' for tear-free gaming on NVIDIA GPUs
- • Ergonomic stand supports portrait mode (Pivot) and height adjustment
- • Excellent motion clarity at 144Hz makes it a top choice for competitive FPS gaming
✗ Cons:
- • Contrast ratio is mediocre (IPS glow is visible in dark rooms; blacks appear gray)
- • Lacks a USB hub and built-in speakers (features found on the pricier '850' model)
- • HDR performance is poor due to low brightness and lack of local dimming
- • Stand lacks swivel adjustment
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • High-speed 200Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) provides fluid motion for racing and FPS games
- • Deep 3,000:1 contrast ratio typical of VA panels creates rich blacks
- • Versatile connectivity with 4 total video inputs (1x DP, 3x HDMI)
- • Includes a fully adjustable stand (Height, Tilt, Swivel) which is rare at this price point
- • Unique white chassis ('Nebula White') stands out from standard black monitors
✗ Cons:
- • Resolution (2560x1080) has lower pixel density than 1440p, making text look less sharp
- • HDMI ports are limited to lower refresh rates (165Hz and 75Hz) compared to DisplayPort
- • VA panel technology causes some 'black smearing' in dark transitions compared to IPS
- • HDR performance is entry-level due to edge-lit dimming and limited peak brightness
- • Stand footprint is somewhat deep, requiring ample desk space
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 2560x1440 resolution crushes the Sceptre's 2560x1080.
Who should buy each?
Choose the LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor if: you prioritize sharp visuals for gaming or photography, need a high-resolution display for detailed work, or play competitive FPS games. (27" display, 144 Hz refresh)
Choose the Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor if: you want a larger curved display for immersive gaming, need a budget-friendly option, or enjoy watching movies and streaming. (30" display, 200 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor excels if you value ideal 27-inch qhd sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p. Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize high-speed 200hz refresh rate (via displayport) provides fluid motion for racing and fps games. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.