Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Nothing Phone (2)
In the battle of Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Nothing Phone (2), the razr+ takes the lead with its stunning 6.9" display and an impressive 165Hz refresh rate. If you're after a flagship experience, the razr+ excels with features like a dual-camera setup that includes a telephoto lens for stunning portraits. . After using both for a week, it’s clear that while the razr+ shines in display performance, the Nothing Phone is the better option for extended use and eye-catching aesthetics.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Nothing Phone (2)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Nothing Phone (2)

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Nothing Phone (2)
| Criterion | Motorola razr+ (2024) | Nothing Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(206)Best Buy | ★4.6(397)Amazon |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates | 3 years of Android OS upgrades and 4 years of security updates (bimonthly) |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 735 | Adreno 730 |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR5 |
Storage | 256GB (UFS 4.0) | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB UFS 3.1 |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" | 6.7" |
Screen Type | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED | LTPO OLED, 1-120Hz Adaptive, 1,600 nits (Peak Pixel Brightness) |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi | 2412 x 1080 (FHD+) at 394 ppi |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz (Main and Cover) | 1Hz - 120Hz (LTPO Adaptive) |
Peak Brightness | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) | 1,600 nits (HDR Peak); 1,000 nits (Outdoor Full Screen) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus | 50MP Sony IMX890, f/1.88, OIS, EIS, 24mm equivalent |
Ultra-Wide Camera | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) | 50MP Samsung JN1, f/2.2, 114-degree FOV, 4cm Macro Mode |
Telephoto Camera | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom | Up to 10x |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps | 4K @ 60fps (Main & Ultrawide); Live HDR at 4K/30fps |
Front Camera | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology | 32MP Sony IMX615, f/2.45, 1080p @ 60fps |
Battery | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) | 4,700mAh |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) | 45W PPS (Full charge in 55 mins) |
Wireless Charging | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging | 15W Qi Dual-coil (Full charge in 130 mins); 5W Reverse Wireless |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish | IP54 (Splash, Water, and Dust Resistant); Corning Gorilla Glass 5 (Front & Back) |
Dimensions | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) | 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 in (162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm) |
Weight | 6.67 oz (189 g) | 7.09 oz (201.2 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock | Optical under-display fingerprint sensor, Face Unlock |
Extras | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos | Glyph Interface (33 addressable LED zones), Glyph Composer, Essential Notifications, Stereo Speakers |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Nothing Phone (2)
✓ Pros:
- • Iconic transparent design with functional Glyph Interface lighting
- • Excellent performance stability with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- • Power-efficient LTPO OLED display (1-120Hz)
- • Clean, bloatware-free software experience (Nothing OS)
- • Supports both wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
✗ Cons:
- • IP54 rating is lower than IP68 found in competitors (Pixel 7/8, Galaxy S23 FE)
- • Camera system lacks a dedicated telephoto/optical zoom lens
- • Digital zoom performance (max 10x) is weak compared to class leaders
- • Ultrawide sensor (Samsung JN1) struggles in low light compared to main sensor
- • No charger included in the box
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better buy for most people - its 165Hz display crushes the Nothing Phone (2) in smoothness.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want a flagship display for gaming, enjoy taking high-quality portrait photos, or need a sleek design that turns heads. (6.9" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the Nothing Phone (2) if: you prioritize battery life for all-day use, appreciate a unique aesthetic with its Glyph Interface, or want a cleaner software experience without bloatware. (6.7" display, 120 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Motorola razr+ (2024) excels if you value largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Nothing Phone (2) is better if you prioritize iconic transparent design with functional glyph interface lighting. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
