LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor vs BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
When comparing the LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor and the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor, the LG takes the lead in performance with its stunning 2560 x 1440 resolution versus the BenQ's 1920 x 1080. This makes the LG a no-brainer for gamers and professionals needing sharper visuals in 2026. In real-world use, the LG's 144Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time offer a smoother experience, ideal for fast-paced gaming, while the BenQ's 60Hz and 5ms response time will struggle in that scenario. If you're more focused on eye comfort and general use, BenQ's features shine through, but for serious performance, the LG is unmatched. Key specs: Display: 27" vs 23.8" and Refresh: 144 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? The LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor (mid-range) and BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor (budget-friendly) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | LG 27GL83A-B | BenQ GW2480 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.5★ (13,197 reviews) | ✓4.6★ (19,967 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Ideal 27-inch QHD sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p | Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light |
| Main Drawback | Contrast ratio is mediocre (IPS glow is visible in dark rooms; blacks appear gray) | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming) |
| Market Position | ✓Mid-range | Budget |
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (QHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor vs BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
| Criterion | LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor | BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(13,197)Amazon | ★4.6(19,967)Amazon |
Screen Size | 27" Viewable (27" Class) | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) |
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | IPS (In-Plane Switching) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 1 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 350 nits (Typical) / 280 nits (Min) | 250 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Typical) / 700:1 (Min) | 1,000:1 (Native) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 72% NTSC (Approx. 100% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit / 8-bit + FRC) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support only) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | 2x 1 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (110mm), Pivot (90°), Tilt (-5° to 15°); No Swivel | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) |
Power Consumption | 51 W (Typical) / 65 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 16 W (Energy Star) / 27 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 6,100 g (13.5 lbs) | 3,840 g (8.47 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (QHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
144 Hz
1 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Ideal 27-inch QHD sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p
- Fast 1ms IPS panel eliminates motion blur while maintaining vibrant 99% sRGB colors
Cons
- Contrast ratio is mediocre (IPS glow is visible in dark rooms; blacks appear gray)
- Lacks a USB hub and built-in speakers (features found on the pricier '850' model)
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
- Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies are certified by TÜV Rheinland
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming)
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
Which one is better?
The LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 2560 x 1440 resolution crushes the BenQ's 1920 x 1080.
Who should buy each?
Choose the LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor if: you want stunning visuals for gaming, need a high refresh rate for smooth gameplay, or require a responsive monitor for photo editing. (27" display, 144 Hz refresh)
Choose the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor if: you value eye comfort features, prefer built-in speakers for casual use, or need a lighter, more budget-friendly option. (23.8" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 19,967 reviews vs 13,197
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 27GL83A-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor leads with a 4.6★ rating versus 4.5★. That said, LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor or BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor?
LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ideal 27-inch qhd sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p. BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor wins if you value exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. Both are rated highly (4.5★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor and BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor?
Key differences: LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor offers ideal 27-inch qhd sweet spot delivers sharper text and details than 1080p, while BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor stands out with exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. Consider that LG 27GL83A-B 27" UltraGear QHD IPS Monitor contrast ratio is mediocre (ips glow is visible in dark rooms; blacks appear gray). Meanwhile, BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.